CorText Manager around the world

@article{Barrella2021,

title = {Scient metrics analysis of mangrove studies from 1980 to 2020 },

author = {Walter Barrella and Deborah Ferraz R},

url = {https://medcraveonline.com/JAMB/scient-metrics-analysis-of-mangrove-studies-from-1980-to-2020.html},

doi = {10.15406/jamb.2021.10.00320},

issn = {2378-3184},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-09-28},

urldate = {2021-09-28},

journal = {Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology},

volume = {10},

issue = {4},

pages = {188-192},

abstract = {Mangroves are complex transition ecosystems studied and affected by human activities.. This work sought information on articles in scientific journals related to environmental impacts and their forms of management and restoration and those focused on biodiversity conservation. To answer this question, we developed this work based on a scient metric survey of production with a focus on impacts and environmental and Biodiversity responses on mangroves in the last forty years (1980 to 2020), comparing mainly the global scientific production and the production in America, listing areas of research concentration, and journal, period, country and region of publication of papers. With this survey, we could observe a standardization of the research classification area and publication periods, although checking the journals found a great variety of these. As for the regionalization of studies, we could observe that, globally, the region that most contributes to the advancement in this theme is Asia; however, the country that collaborates the most, in isolation, is the United States. Although there is a diversification regarding the specific theme, the scientific production on mangroves with an environmental focus and in Biodiversity followed a global pattern in the studied period.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Loconto2018,

title = {The land sparing – land sharing controversy: Tracing the politics of knowledge},

author = {Allison Loconto and Marion Desquilbet and Théo Moreau and Denis Couvet and Bruno Dorin},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.014},

doi = {10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.014},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-01-01},

urldate = {2019-01-01},

journal = {Land Use Policy},

volume = {96},

abstract = {Feeding 9 billion people by 2050 on one hand, and preserving biodiversity on the other hand, are two shared policy goals at the global level. Yet while these goals are clear, they are to some extent in conflict, because agriculture is a major cause of biodiversity loss, and the path to achieve both of them is at the heart of a public controversy around ‘productive’ land use and biodiversity conservation. Over the years, the scientific, policy, civil society and agri-business communities have been engaged in producing evidence that can support a land sparing policy (separating intensive agricultural production from biodiversity conservation) or a land sharing policy (integrating the two in larger and more extensive landscapes). This paper contributes to this debate by analyzing land sparing and land sharing (LSS) as a socio-technical controversy. Through the analysis of large and small corpora of scientific, policy, corporate social responsibility and sustainability standards documents we explore the ethical underpinnings and social networks that support the opposing sides of this controversy. We explore these linkages in order to explain how the concept of land sparing achieved dominance in the scientific literature and how the concept has been taken up in international policy, business and civil society circles. We examine the convergences and divergences in alliances between actors in this controversy in order to map how specific actors have promoted the concept of land sparing as the best way to used land for biodiversity and food production.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}