CorTexT platform

@article{Lim2023,

title = {Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Artificial Intelligence in Finance: State-of-the-Art and Research Takeaways},

author = {Tristan Lim},

url = {https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr651155

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tristan_Lim5/publication/370228369_Environmental_Social_and_Governance_ESG_and_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Finance_State-of-the-Art_and_Research_Takeaways/links/64474633017bc07902d798dc/Environmental-Social-and-Governance-ESG-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-Finance-State-of-the-Art-and-Research-Takeaways.pdf},

doi = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-2849051/v1},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-04-01},

urldate = {2023-04-01},

abstract = {The rapidly growing research landscape in finance, encompassing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics and associated Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications, presents challenges for both new researchers and seasoned practitioners. This study aims to systematically map the research area, identify knowledge gaps, and examine potential research areas for researchers and practitioners. The investigation centers around three research questions: key research themes for ESG and AI in finance, research intensity and interest evolution, and the use and progression of AI techniques within these themes. Eight archetypical research domains were identified: (i) Trading and Investment, (ii) ESG Disclosure, Measurement and Governance, (iii) Firm Governance, (iv) Financial Markets and Instruments, (v) Risk Management, (vi) Forecasting and Valuation, (vii) Data, and (viii) Responsible Use of AI. Distinctive AI techniques were found to be employed across these archetypes. The study contributes to consolidating knowledge on the intersection of ESG, AI, and finance, offering an ontological inquiry and key takeaways for practitioners and researchers. Important insights include the popularity and crowding of the Trading and Investment domain, the growth potential of the Data archetype, and the high potential of Responsible Use of AI, despite its low publication count. By understanding the nuances of different research archetypes, researchers and practitioners can better navigate this complex landscape and contribute to a more sustainable and responsible financial sector.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Skovgaard2023,

title = {Who tweets what about personalised medicine? Promises and concerns from Twitter discussions in Denmark},

author = {Lea Skovgaard and Anders Grundtvig},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20552076231169832},

doi = {10.1177/20552076231169832},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-03-29},

journal = {Digital Health},

volume = {9},

pages = {1-12},

abstract = {Digital health data are seen as valuable resources for the development of better and more efficient treatments, for instance

through personalised medicine. However, health data are information about individuals who hold opinions and can chal-

lenge how data about them are used. Therefore it is important to understand public discussions around reuse of digital

health data. Social media have been heralded as enabling new forms of public engagement and as a place to study social

issues. In this paper, we study a public debate on Twitter about personalised medicine. We explore who participates in dis-

cussions about personalised medicine on Twitter and what they tweet about. Based on user-generated biographies we cat-

egorise users as having a ‘Professional interest in personalised medicine’ or as ‘Private’ users. We describe how users within

the field tweet about the promises of personalised medicine, while users unaffiliated with the field tweet about the concrete

realisation of these ambitions in the form of a new infrastructure and express concerns about the conditions for the imple-

mentation. Our study serves to remind people interested in public opinion that Twitter is a platform used for multiple pur-

poses by different actors and not simply a bottom-up democratic forum. This study contributes with insights relevant to

policymakers wishing to expand infrastructures for reuse of health data. First, by providing insights into what is discussed

about health data reuse. Second, by exploring how Twitter can be used as a platform to study public discussions about reuse

of health data.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Loconto2023,

title = {Innovations for Sustainable Food Systems: Focusing on Agroecology and Participatory Guarantee Systems},

author = {Allison Marie Loconto and Francisco Garrido-Garza and Ivan Dufeu},

url = {https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/arfe/59/1/59_37/_article/-char/ja/

https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/arfe/59/1/59_37/_pdf/-char/ja},

doi = {10.7310/arfe.59.37},

issn = {2185-9973},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-03-01},

urldate = {2023-03-01},

journal = {Journal of Rural Problems},

volume = {59},

number = {1},

pages = {37-44},

abstract = {While organic agriculture has created a set of institutions that allow producers to know which practices provide “organic” quality and allow consumers to recognize it via an on-package label, the landscape of agroecological products is quite fluid and diverse. Often, products are traded directly between producers and consumers and quality is conveyed verbally. However, there has been a general increase in the use of private labels to claim that products are agroecological or “more than organic”. This article explores these recent innovations by asking: How does agroecology become a product quality claim in innovative forms of quality control? To answer this question, data on labels claiming to be “agroecological” and related assurance systems were gathered through internet research, market monitoring and semi-structured interviews in the European Union. In this article we explore the range of claims, and control networks, used to characterize the so-called “agroecological” labels and confront them with FAO’s 10 principles of agroecology. This 27-country comparison offers interesting insights into the overlaps and boundaries between agroecology and organic agriculture in terms of the markets that are created.},

note = {農林業問題研究},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Duan2023,

title = {The research hotspots and trends of volatile organic compound emissions from anthropogenic and natural sources: A systematic quantitative review},

author = {Chensong Duan and Hu Liao and Kaide Wang and Yin Ren},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935122017133?via%3Dihub



},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114386},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-02-01},

urldate = {2023-02-01},

journal = {Environmental Research},

volume = {216},

pages = {114964},

abstract = {Volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions have attracted wide attention due to their impacts on atmospheric quality and public health. However, most studies reviewed certain aspects of natural VOCs (NVOCs) or anthropogenic VOCs (AVOCs) rather than comprehensively quantifying the hotspots and evolution trends of AVOCs and NVOCs. We combined the bibliometric method with the evolution tree and Markov chain to identify research focus and uncover the trends in VOC emission sources. This study found that research mainly focused on VOC emission characteristics, effects on air quality and health, and VOC emissions under climate change. More studies concerned on AVOCs than on NVOCs, and AVOC emissions have shifted with a decreasing proportion of transport emissions and an increasing share of solvent utilization in countries with high emissions and publications (China and the USA). Research on AVOCs is imperative to develop efficient and economical abatement techniques specific to solvent sources or BTEX species to mitigate the detrimental effects. Research on NVOCs originating from human sources risen due to their application in medicine, while studies on sources sensitive to climate change grew slowly, including plants, biomass burning, microbes, soil and oceans. Research on the long-term responses of NVOCs derived from various sources to climate warming is warranted to explore the evolution of emissions and the feedback on global climate. It is worthwhile to establish an emission inventory with all kinds of sources, accurate estimation, high spatial and temporal resolution to capture the emission trends in the synergy of industrialization and climate change as well as to simulate the effects on air quality. We review VOC emissions from both anthropogenic and natural sources under climate change and their effects on atmospheric quality and health to point out the research directions for the comprehensive control of global VOCs and mitigation of O3 pollution.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}