Cortext platform

@article{Louvel2022,

title = {Biological embedding vs. embodiment of social experiences: How these two concepts form distinct thought styles around the social production of health inequalities},

author = {Séverine Louvel and Alexandra Soulier},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0277953622007766?via%3Dihub},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115470},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-01},

urldate = {2022-10-01},

journal = {Social Science & Medicine},

volume = {314},

issue = {115470},

abstract = {Objectives



This article compares research on biological embedding and the embodiment of social experiences, two concepts proposed in the 1990s to introduce a new perspective on the social production of health inequalities. We draw on Ludwig Fleck's concept of ‘thought style’ (1935/2008) to question the possible emergence of a common research program around the processes by which the social becomes biological.



Methods

We compiled a corpus of 322 articles referring to either biological embedding or to the embodiment of social experiences, identified in the Web of Science core collection and published from 1990 to 2021. We analyzed the articles’ use of these concepts using scientometric indicators and qualitative content analysis.



Results

Initial differences between the research agendas associated with biological embedding and embodiment are strengthened as both concepts circulate around scientific communities studying the social production of health inequalities. Thought styles formed around embedding and embodiment differ significantly in terms of shared references, sets of methods and research questions, and policy recommendations. Research on biological embedding forms a thought style shared by researchers in the biomedical and public health sciences. Conversely, the concept of embodiment of social experiences connects perspectives from biomedical, public health, human and social sciences, and gathers three thought styles, one identical to that of biological embedding and two formed in social epidemiology and in medical anthropology.



Conclusions

Acknowledging the differences between the concepts and divergences in their evolution provides an opportunity for identification of topics where thought styles are either complementary or in tension.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Hernandez-Tenorio2022b,

title = {Improving Deproteinization in Colombian Latex from Hevea brasiliensis: A Bibliometric Approximation},

author = {Fabian Hernandez-Tenorio and Héctor Arroyave-Miranda and Alejandra M. Miranda and Sandra M. González and Carlos A. Rodríguez and Alex A. Sáez},

url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/19/4248/pdf?version=1665409167

https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/14/19/4248},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14194248},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-01},

urldate = {2022-10-01},

journal = {Polymers},

volume = {14},

issue = {9},

abstract = {Natural Rubber Field Latex (NRFL) allergens restrict its use in some markets due to health-threatening allergic reactions. These molecules are proteins that are related to asymptomatic sensitization and hypersensitivity mediated by immunoglobulin E (IgE). Although NRFL allergens have been investigated since the 1980s, there are still gaps in knowledge regarding the development of deproteinized natural rubber (DPNR). Therefore, in this study, the deproteinization of NRFL from the lower basin of the Cauca River, Antioquia-Colombia was evaluated using eight systems. The highest removal value was 84.4% and was obtained from the treatment containing SDS (Sodium dodecyl sulfate), Urea, and Ethanol. It was also possible to determine that at high concentrations of SDS, removal percentages higher than 70% are reached. On the other hand, all deproteinizing systems decreased NRFL Zeta potentials without self-coagulation, suggesting enhanced colloidal stability in DPNR latex. On the other hand, the bibliometric analysis presented technological advances in DPRN through different parameters and bibliometric networks. The analysis presented makes an important contribution from the bibliometric approach that could be positive for the development of research on DPNR.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Malanski2022,

title = {Le travail en agriculture dans la littérature académique internationale (2010–2019)},

author = {Priscila Duarte Malanski and Sandra Mara de Alencar Schiavi and Benoît Dedieu },

url = {https://www.cahiersagricultures.fr/articles/cagri/pdf/2022/01/cagri220018.pdf

https://www.cahiersagricultures.fr/articles/cagri/abs/2022/01/cagri220018/cagri220018.html},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2022021 },

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-10-01},

journal = {Cahiers Agricultures},

volume = {31},

number = {23},

abstract = {Dans le monde, près de la moitié de la population vit en milieu rural et l’agriculture est le deuxième secteur qui emploie le plus. Les problématiques liées au travail en agriculture sont diverses. Notre objectif est de caractériser le panorama international des thématiques de recherche sur le travail en agriculture à partir d’une analyse bibliométrique des articles anglophones publiés entre 2010 et 2019 dans les bases de données Web of Science et Scopus. Nous avons réalisé des analyses synchroniques (i.e. identification de réseaux de co-occurrence de mots-clés) et diachroniques (i.e. évolution de l’importance de certains objets de recherche dans le temps). Six principales thématiques de recherche sont identifiées : allocation de la main-d’œuvre, dynamiques du marché du travail, genre et vulnérabilités, santé au travail, organisation du travail dans les exploitations, gouvernance du travail dans les chaînes agroalimentaires. Les approches disciplinaires sont les plus fréquentes pour analyser les différentes problématiques, mais elles peinent à les relier les unes aux autres. Les sept objets de recherche identifiés à partir des thématiques (genre, migrations, travail des enfants, santé, organisation du travail, emploi, gouvernance du travail dans les chaînes agroalimentaires) ont suivi différentes évolutions pendant les 10 dernières années (consolidation, instabilité, émergence). Ce panorama suggère que la pluridisciplinarité est nécessaire pour explorer des objets émergents (ex. : migrations, gouvernance du travail dans les chaînes agroalimentaires) et ceux qui sont au croisement des enjeux de société (ex. : innovations).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{nokey,

title = {Identifying research supporting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals},

author = {Yury Kashnitsky and Guillaume Roberge and Jingwen Mu and Kevin Kang and Weiwei Wang and Maurice Vanderfeesten and Maxim Rivest and Lennart Keßler and Robert Jaworek and Maéva Vignes and Bamini Jayabalasingham and Finne Boonen and Chris James and Marius Doornenbal and Isabelle Labrosse},

url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.07285},

doi = {10.48550/ARXIV.2209.07285},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-15},

urldate = {2022-09-15},

publisher = {arXiv},

abstract = {The United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) challenge the global community to build a world where no one is left behind. Recognizing that research plays a fundamental part in supporting these goals, attempts have been made to classify research publications according to their relevance in supporting each of the UN's SDGs. In this paper, we outline the methodology that we followed when mapping research articles to SDGs and which is adopted by Times Higher Education in their Social Impact rankings. We also discuss various aspects in which the methodology can be improved and generalized to other types of content apart from research articles. The results presented in this paper are the outcome of the SDG Research Mapping Initiative that was established as a partnership between the University of Southern Denmark, the Aurora European Universities Alliance (represented by Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam), the University of Auckland, and Elsevier to bring together broad expertise and share best practices on identifying research contributions to UN's Sustainable Development Goals. },

note = {This work is partly an outcome of SDG Research Mapping Initiative6 that Elsevier initiated with the Aurora European

Universities Alliance, the University of Auckland, and the University of Southern Denmark. We are also grateful to

Scopus for providing data for the analysis.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}