CorTexT platform

@article{McIlwaine2021,

title = {A state-of-the-art techno-economic review of distributed and embedded energy storage for energy systems},

author = {Neil McIlwaine and Aoife M. Foley and D. John Morrow and Dlzar Al Kez and Chongyu Zhang and Xi Lu and Robert J. Best},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544221007106},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120461},

issn = {0360-5442},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-08-15},

journal = {Energy},

volume = {229},

pages = {120461},

abstract = {Renewable energy is projected to play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and in realising the climate change goals. Large scale development of variable renewable energy, which is regarded as non-dispatchable, requires additional power system quality services such as voltage regulation, frequency regulation and inertial response. Energy storage provides an important means to supply these services but there are many uncertainties in terms of technology, market readiness, economics, and regulatory requirements. The aim of this study is to undertake a global state-of-the-art review of the techno-economic and regulatory status of energy storage and power quality services at the distribution level. The review will establish the global trends in electricity markets that have seen high levels of renewable energy penetration. The results of the investigation indicate that further research is required to qualify, quantify, and value the installation of mass energy storage particularly at the distribution level.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Puetz2021,

title = {Meaning structures in the world polity: A semantic network analysis of human rights terminology in the world's peace agreements},

author = {Kyle Puetz and Andrew P. Davis and Alexander B. Kinney},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X21000887},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101598},

issn = {0304-422X},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-08-12},

journal = {Poetics},

pages = {101598},

abstract = {We examine changes in the use of human rights language in peace agreement texts from 1990 to 2018. Existing research in world polity theory examines institutional change through the lens of increasing isomorphism, a lens that generally fails to appreciate qualitative transformations in the meaning of institutional concepts across time. As a corrective to this approach, we endorse a meaning-structure institutionalism that conceives institutional concepts in relational terms and use a method of textual analysis — semantic network analysis — to analyze and formally model the shifting meaning of human rights in peace agreement texts. We show that human rights language in peace agreements has undergone multiple qualitative shifts since its initial emergence in the mid-1980s. Specifically, the term human rights occupies a marginal position in peace agreement texts in the 1990s, is used in reference to and thus bridges multiple substantive themes in the 2000s, and, finally, inhabits a conceptual silo in the 2010s in the sense that it is associated with many concepts within but no concepts outside of a semantic community related to rights and democracy. We discuss implications for world polity theories of institutionalism that follow from our relational framework.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Bordignon2021b,

title = {Over‐promotion and caution in abstracts of preprints during the COVID ‐19 crisis},

author = {Frederique Bordignon and Liana Ermakova and Marianne Noël},

url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1411},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1411},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-07-21},

urldate = {2021-07-21},

organization = {Learned Publishing},

abstract = {The abstract is known to be a promotional genre where researchers tend to exaggerate the benefit of their research and use a promotional discourse to catch the reader's attention. The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted intensive research and has changed traditional publishing with the massive adoption of preprints by researchers. Our aim is to investigate whether the crisis and the ensuing scientific and economic competition have changed the lexical content of abstracts. We propose a comparative study of abstracts associated with preprints issued in response to the pandemic relative to abstracts produced during the closest pre-pandemic period. We show that with the increase (on average and in percentage) of positive words (especially effective) and the slight decrease of negative words, there is a strong increase in hedge words (the most frequent of which are the modal verbs can and may). Hedge words counterbalance the excessive use of positive words and thus invite the readers, who go probably beyond the ‘usual’ audience, to be cautious with the obtained results. The abstracts of preprints urgently produced in response to the COVID-19 crisis stand between uncertainty and over-promotion, illustrating the balance that authors have to achieve between promoting their results and appealing for caution.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Lavau2021,

title = {Qu’est-ce qu’un théorème (en pratique) ? },

author = {Sylvain Lavau},

url = {http://journals.openedition.org.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/rac/22479},

doi = {https://doi-org.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/10.4000/rac.22479},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-06-01},

journal = {Revue d’anthropologie des connaissances},

abstract = {Cet article défend les avantages d’une perspective sociologique en philosophie de la pratique mathématique. En s’appuyant sur la littérature en sociologie des sciences, il propose une approche de la pratique mathématique qui s’appuie sur la notion de communauté mathématique, et évalue le rôle de la notion de métamathématique dans le changement mathématique et dans les pratiques mathématiques stabilisées. Il s’appuie sur une étude de cas : l’émergence de la théorie du contrôle géométrique au début des années 1970 et les pratiques citationnelles associées à la communauté de la théorie du contrôle depuis le milieu des années 1990. Cette étude de cas montre que l’introduction d’outils géométriques dans la théorie du contrôle à la fin des années 1960 a induit un changement dans les vues métamathématiques que les théoricien·nes du contrôle avaient sur leurs objets. Je démontre ensuite comment l’appartenance à la communauté de la théorie du contrôle façonne la production et la réception des théorèmes de Štefan, Sussmann et Nagano. Interprétant le développement historique et les pratiques citationnelles de cette communauté à travers la perspective de la métamathématique, je conclus en discutant le rôle du théorème des orbites en théorie du contrôle, à la fois comme une étiquette désignant un certain contenu cognitif, et comme marqueur social d’appartenance à cette communauté.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}