Cortext platform

@online{Andro2021,

title = {Digital libraries: textual analysis for a systematic review and meta-analysis},

author = {Mathieu Andro and Marc Maisonneuve},

url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03270523},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-06-24},

urldate = {2021-06-24},

abstract = {Purpose: We seek to explore the realm of literature about digital libraries. We specifically seek to ascertain how interest in this subject has evolved, its impact, the most productive journals and countries, the number of occurrences of digital libraries, the relationships and dynamics of the main concepts mentioned, and the dynamics of metadata formats.



Methods: We extracted corpora from the Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic Search bibliographic databases. We analyzed the named entities and concepts contained within these corpora with the help of text mining technologies, CorTexT in particular.



Results: While the number of publications on the subject of digital libraries is increasing, their average number of citations is decreasing. China, the United States and India are the most productive countries on the subject. Literature about conservation and national libraries has gradually been replaced by literature about open access, university libraries and the relationship with users. Internet Archive is the most cited digital library in literature and continues to grow. Dublin Core is the most talked about metadata format, however the subject of metadata formats is declining in the corpus today.



Conclusion: Digital libraries now seem to be reaching the age of maturity.},

note = {HAL Id : hal-03270523 , version 1 ; ARXIV : 2106.13469},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {online}

}

@online{Bernard2021,

title = {Conspiracy theories in the age of Covid-19. A comparative analysis of France and the UK.},

author = {Alexander Bernard and Michiel Bartelds and Cristobal Marin Rojas and Christin Moss and Ece Ucar},

url = {https://fonio.medialab.sciences-po.fr/alaris/read/99fd5a0c-42e3-483a-991c-15de519db3db?lang=en},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-05-01},

organization = {Science Po},

abstract = {Since its beginning, the Covid-19 crisis has disrupted the world order. Other than showing the flaws in health care systems worldwide, the crisis also unveiled a number of deeply rooted conspiracy theories that either linked the Covid-19 pandemic to existing conspiratory frames or designed new theories around the pandemic.

Although online conspiracy-spreading communities are certainly not a new phenomenon, they proliferated on social media more than ever before during the Covid-19 pandemic . This happened as social media, as a source of knowledge and information about current affairs, became even more important due to the unknown nature of the virus .

Different types of Covid-19 conspiracy theories can be distinguished. Some adherents believe in conspiracy theories related to vaccine safety whereas others believe that reported Covid-19 death rates are deliberately greatly exaggerated. Moreover, even 5G technology has been accused for activating the virus inside the human body. Similarly, there is a tendency to believe in the powerful countries' and organisations' role in the "creation" of the virus. For example, a YouGov survey found

that 28% of Britons and 36% of French think that the pandemic's emergence is connected to a single group of people who "control the events and rule the world together." This is further supported by a study

conducted in 2021 by the Cevipof political research center indicating a high rate of government suspicion among the population.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {online}

}

@online{Bento2021,

title = {Legitimacy and Guidance in Upscaling Energy Technology Innovations},

author = {Nuno Bento and Margarida Fontes},

url = {https://repositorio.iscte-iul.pt/bitstream/10071/21960/4/WP_2021-01.pdf},

doi = {10.15847/dinamiacet-iul.wp.2021.01},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-02-28},

urldate = {2021-02-28},

organization = {SCTE-IUL},

abstract = {The paper aims to improve the understanding about the role of expectations and key innovation processes,  such  as  legitimation  and  guidance,  in  the  upscaling  of  low-carbon  innovations.  We analyze roadmaps developed for floating offshore wind energy to investigate how actors prepare for  system  growth.  We  focus  on  how  roadmaps  contribute  to  the  formation  and  sharing  of expectations  through  their  influence  on  system  acceptability  (legitimacy) and  attractiveness (guidance),  enabling  access  to  crucial  resources.  The  analysis  reveals  that  institutional  and technological context affect guidance, namely a higher external openness as technology matures and governments are involved. An actors’ survey finds  that  overpromising  reduces  roadmaps impact on expectations. Analyses of media coverage and Internet searches show that roadmaps affect public perceptions indirectly, through the promotion of experiments. Implications include new  directions  for  conceptualizing  legitimacy,  guidance  and  expectations  in  technological innovation  systems,  as  well  as  recommendations  for  managing  key  processes  in  systems’ upscaling.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {online}

}

@online{nokey,

title = {Infodemic 5G : How Interpretative Frames are Co-articulated on Social Media? An Instagram versus Parler Case Study},

author = {Niels ten Oever and Maxigas and Bryan Steffen and Eleni Maragkou and Emile Provendier and Emma Breuer and Giovanni Lombardi and Giulio Valentini and Jasper van der Heide and Jörn Preuß and Roxana Varvara Boboc and Selin Ashaghimina and Sylvain Mignot and Veronica Fanzio and Veronica Moretti},

editor = {The Digital Methods Initiative (DMI)},

url = {https://digitalmethods.net/Dmi/WinterSchool2021Infodemic5G},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-01-28},

urldate = {2021-01-28},

abstract = {The main takeaways from this project are the differences in how 5G is discussed on mainstream and alternative platforms (Instagram vs. Parler) and the connection to the way 5G is represented by vendors and network operators. The key finding is that the vendors and network operators discuss 5G in vague terms, failing to create a concrete and meaningful imaginary that people can draw from. In this context, users from various platforms associated 5G with several issues, which vary across mainstream and alternative platforms. The main takeaway in this regard is that the discourse on Instagram is much more fragmented and lacks cohesion, leading to several clusters of themes with little to no connections between them. On the other hand, Parler hosts a much more coherent approach, where the discussion is much more concrete and related to politics and corporate figures. The project explores these various critical interpretative frames to gain a sense of how 5G is conceived by various communities versus how it is presented by manufacturers.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {online}

}