Cortext platform

@techreport{Aubin2018,

title = {eROSA. e-infrastructure Roadmap for Open Science in Agriculture : bibliometric study results},

author = {Sophie Aubin and Madeleine Huber},

url = {https://zenodo.org/record/1305000/files/Bibliometric%20study%20results.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-06-28},

urldate = {2018-06-28},

institution = {INRA, Horizon 2020},

abstract = {This study highlights the results of a bibliometric analysis conducted at a global scale in order to identify key scientists and associated research performing organisations (e.g. public research institutes, universities, Research & Development departments of private companies) that work in the field of agricultural data sources and services. The added value of such a methodological approach is the resulting ability to provide a detailed answer to the question “who does what?” by collecting, processing, analysing and visualising the metadata1 of related scientific publications. The study focuses on articles that have been published in the past 10 years (i.e. during the period 2005-2015). As such, the analysis is a first attempt at delineating, mapping and describing the scientific community that the e-ROSA project seeks to engage with. It neither aims at being exhaustive nor at providing an evaluation on the scientific excellence of identified stakeholders as this is not the goal of the community-building activity under e-ROSA. The specific objectives of the analysis include:

1 - The identification of scientists and related collaboration networks involved in data science for agriculture in order to initiate further contact while building and engaging with the e-ROSA community throughout the project: e.g. these results provide valuable contacts in the context of the desk surveys that will be carried out under Work Package 1 in order to consolidate and reach out to the community, and in the context of the workshops organised under Work Package 2 that seek community-building and co-design of the e-ROSA Roadmap.

2 - The identification of specific domains related to data and computer science that are of interest to identified scientists (i.e. working on agricultural issues).

3 - The identification of related conferences and journals that the e-ROSA project can target in order to effectively reach out to the relevant communities involved in data science issues related to agriculture.},

note = {Ref. Ares(2018)3404573},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}

@techreport{Moore2018,

title = {Understanding the role of culture, gender and communication traditions, and their implications for engagement methodologies, communication and dissemination},

author = {Vanessa Moore and Gerard Horgan and Rebecca Moore},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-05-31},

institution = {GoNano, Horizon 2020, European Institute of Women’s Health },

abstract = {The GoNano -Governing Nanotechnologies though societal engagement-project is a 36-month long project  which  aims  to  improve  the  responsiveness  of  research  and  innovation  processes  to  public values and concerns. Part  of  the  GoNano  objectives  are  to  create  an  engagement  process  which  is  cognisant  of  gender, diversity, culture and communication traditions across Europe. This engagement process will inform future nanotechnology development, by ways of public discourse and methodology development, as well as co-creation. In order to adequately align nanotechnology Research and Innovation (R&I) with societal needs, it is important to look at societal issues such as gender, culture, and diversity. These areas of focus present us with an opportunity to get a deeper insight  into what motivates opinions, thoughts,  needs,  values  and  concerns --are  these  the  same,  or  are  there  differences  between  or within  various  groups?  Does  gender  have  any  impact  on  how  values,  needs  and  concerns  around nanotechnology are shaped; does demographic diversity influence such concerns? What information and knowledge can we glean from looking into divergences of opinions and differences in discourse? What can we gain from increased awareness and focus on these issues?},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {techreport}

}