CorText Manager around the world

@article{nokey,

title = {Tracking the featured topics of the International Science of Team Science conference series and their evolution during 2010-2019},

author = {Ruinan Li and Raf Guns and Tim C. E. Engels and Lin Zhang and Ying Huang},

url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-023-04651-3

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ying-Huang-137/publication/368301245_Tracking_the_featured_topics_of_the_International_Science_of_Team_Science_conference_series_and_their_evolution_during_2010-2019/links/63e1299962d2a24f920a754a/Tracking-the-featured-topics-of-the-International-Science-of-Team-Science-conference-series-and-their-evolution-during-2010-2019.pdf},

doi = {/10.1007/s11192-023-04651-3},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-02-11},

journal = {Scientometrics},

issue = {128},

pages = {2447–2469},

abstract = {In this paper, we study how research topics and trends have evolved in the field of the science of team science (SciTS). Over the past 12 years, the International Science of Team Science conference has been making efforts to understand and enhance the processes and outcomes of collaborative team science. We argue that the sessions and papers in academic conferences are the best way to reflect the latest research trends. Based on the panel sessions and submitted papers in conference programs during 2010-2019, this study tracks the featured topics and how they have evolved in the field. We extracted terms from the titles of the sessions and papers, and visualized the research hotspots, research topics, and how they have evolved for analysis. We found that the research hotspots are constantly changing, and the research topics present evolutionary characteristics, such as continuation, split, and fusion. Additionally, we examined the models and case studies of team science, the characteristics and dynamics of teams, the interdisciplinary research dynamics in team science, team science education and training, and how team science is measured and evaluated. These results summarize the major research trends and opportunities in the SciTS field.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Zhao2021,

title = {Is coronavirus-related research becoming more interdisciplinary? A perspective of co-occurrence analysis and diversity measure of scientific articles},

author = {Yi Zhao and Lifan Liu and Chengzhi Zhang},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121344},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-11-08},

urldate = {2021-11-08},

journal = {Technological Forecasting and Social Change},

volume = {121344},

abstract = {The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has had a significant repercussion on the health, economy, politics and environment, making coronavirus-related issues more complicated and difficult to adequately address by relying on a single field. Interdisciplinary research can provide an effective solution to complex issues in the related field of coronavirus. However, whether coronavirus-related research becomes more interdisciplinary still needs corroboration. In this study, we investigate interdisciplinary status of the coronavirus-related fields via the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (CORD-19). To this end, we calculate bibliometric indicators of interdisciplinarity and apply a co-occurrence analysis method. The results show that co-occurrence relationships between cited disciplines have evolved dynamically over time. The two types of co-occurrence relationships, Immunology and Microbiology & Medicine and Chemical Engineering & Chemistry, last for a long time in this field during 1990–2020. Moreover, the number of disciplines cited by coronavirus-related research increases, whereas the distribution of disciplines is uneven, and this field tends to focus on several dominant disciplines such as Medicine, Immunology and Microbiology, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. We also measure the disciplinary diversity of COVID-19 related papers published from January to December 2020; the disciplinary variety shows an upward trend, while the degree of disciplinary balance shows a downward trend. Meanwhile, the comprehensive index 2Ds demonstrates that the degree of interdisciplinarity in coronavirus field decreases between 1990 and 2019, but it increases in 2020. The results help to map the interdisciplinarity of coronavirus-related research, gaining insight into the degree and history of interdisciplinary cooperation.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}