CorText Manager around the world

@inbook{Féron2025,

title = {Cartographie des sciences de l’antibiorésistance (1991-2021) - Chapitre 7. Des savoirs anthropocentrés},

author = {Aurélien Féron and Nicolas Fortané },

url = {https://shs.cairn.info/article/SCPO_BOULL_2025_01_0173},

doi = {/10.3917/scpo.boull.2025.01.0173},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-04-10},

booktitle = {L'antibiodépendance - L'impossible transistion de l'élevage industriel},

pages = {173 - 194},

publisher = {Presses de Sciences Po},

chapter = {7},

school = {Sciences Po},

abstract = {Depuis la fin des années 2000, les politiques de lutte contre l’antibiorésistance se sont multipliées à différentes échelles (de l’international au national) et cela, dans le contexte particulier de l’essor du paradigme « One Health ». Des organisations internationales (comme l’Organisation des Nations unies), supranationales (comme l’Union européenne) ainsi que de nombreux États ont défini les modalités de leur combat contre ce fléau avec ce référentiel à l’esprit. Selon l’approche « One Health », la lutte contre les grandes menaces sanitaires de notre temps ne peut être conduite de manière efficiente qu’avec une plus forte attention aux interactions entre les secteurs de la santé humaine, de la santé animale et de l’environnement. Cette notion trouve son origine dans une longue et complexe histoire d’idées, de plaidoyers et d’alliances scientifiques et politiques qui s’est déployée tout au long du xxe siècle (Cassidy, 2016 ; 2018). Au point de rencontre entre deux mouvements, issus pour l’un des sciences vétérinaires, pour l’autre d’une frange de la santé publique s’intéressant aux zoonoses, elle a fédéré de nombreux acteurs, vers la fin des années 2000, sous l’impulsion de diverses réponses internationales à des risques de pandémie. Formulée par de nombreuses instances et à de multiples échelles de l’action publique, elle est devenue une injonction s’adressant aussi bien au champ politique que scientifique. Cela ne va pas sans créer des tensions. Si l’appel à l’intersectorialité constitue l’un des fondements de l’approche « One Health », des travaux portant sur des domaines connexes à celui de l’antibiorésistance ont souligné les difficultés à dépasser un fonctionnement en silos, aussi bien du côté des organisations professionnelles et politiques (Jerolmack, 2013) que des disciplines scientifiques (Manlove et al., 2016 ; Humboldt-Dachroeden et al., 2020). D’autres ont souligné la prévalence d’un anthropocentrisme dans les espaces politiques et professionnels impliqués dans les luttes contre l’antibiorésistance et les maladies zoonotiques, qui demeurent principalement tournées vers le maintien et l’amélioration de la santé humaine, tandis que les animaux et l’environnement restent considérés comme secondaires (Hinchliffe, 2015 ; Kamenshchikova et al., 2021 ; Canãda et al., 2022).



La recherche scientifique est un rouage clé de la gestion de problèmes publics tels que celui de l’antibiorésistance. Elle étudie ses causes, ses conséquences et les manières de la résoudre, du moins de lutter contre elle. Les pouvoirs publics considèrent ses travaux comme les fondements les plus légitimes et sollicitent de nombreux chercheurs comme experts pour produire des études et des avis qu’ils mobilisent, aux côtés d’autres considérations, pour produire l’action publique [1]. Il est donc essentiel d’analyser comment la recherche académique sur l’antibiorésistance est elle-même structurée afin de comprendre les cadrages et les jeux d’acteurs au fil desquels se tissent les modalités de gestion de ce problème. La production des connaissances académiques sur l’antibiorésistance obéit-elle à des configurations en silos observés dans des domaines connexes ? Est-elle structurée par l’anthropocentrisme qui caractérise les arènes politiques et professionnelles afférentes ?



Tel est l’objet de ce chapitre, qui met à l’épreuve l’image stéréotypée d’un domaine académique compartimenté en trois secteurs (homme, animal, environnement) afin d’analyser comment l’univers scientifique de l’antibiorésistance s’est construit. Il s’appuie sur l’étude d’un corpus représentatif de l’ensemble de la littérature sur l’antibiorésistance publiée entre 1991 et 2021 à l’échelle internationale et dresse une cartographie des grandes questions qui ont structuré les travaux dans ce domaine au cours des trois dernières décennies. Ce faisant, il montre de quels tropismes, de quels découpages et de quelles interfaces (entre spécialités scientifiques et entre leurs objets d’attention) la recherche d’aujourd’hui a hérité. Il décrit les thèmes majeurs et les disciplines prépondérantes qui, depuis le début des années 1990, structurent les sciences et ainsi participent à la lutte contre l’antibiorésistance à différents niveaux, en alimentant l’expertise et en sous-tendant l’action publique.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{D2024,

title = {Advances and Applications of Polyelectrolytes},

author = {Martina Zuñiga D and Francisca L. Aranda and Fabian Hernandez-Tenorio and Karla A. Garrido and Manuel F. Meléndrez and Enrique M. Combatt and Manuel Palencia and Daniel A. Palacio},

url = {https://videleaf.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Advances-and-Applications-of-Polyelectrolytes.pdf},

doi = {/10.3390/polym16101434},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-08-20},

address = {Chile},

school = {Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Concepción},

abstract = {In recent decades, polyelectrolytes (PELs) have attracted significant interest owing to a surge in research dedicated to the development of new technologies and applications at the biological level. Polyelectrolytes are macromolecules of which a substantial portion of the constituent units contains ionizable or ionic groups. These macromolecules demonstrate varied behaviors across different pH ranges, ionic strengths, and concentrations, making them fascinating subjects within the scientific community. The aim of this review is to present a comprehensive survey of the progress in the application studies of polyelectrolytes and their derivatives in various fields that are vital for the advancement, conservation, and technological progress of the planet, including agriculture, environmental science, and medicine. Through this bibliographic review, we seek to highlight the significance of these materials and their extensive range of applications in modern times.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Khan2024,

title = {Bibliometric Analysis of Dubious Research},

author = {Muhammad Asif Khan and Humaira Farid and Imtiaz Ali},

url = {https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/1180524},

doi = {/10.5772/intechopen.1005274},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-06-12},

booktitle = {Bibliometrics - An Essential Methodological Tool for Research Projects [Working Title]},

abstract = {Retracted papers are scientific or scholarly works officially withdrawn by the publisher or journal after their initial publication. The primary goal of retractions is to rectify the literature and alert readers about articles containing substantially flawed or erroneous content or data, or due to ethical concerns, rendering reported findings and conclusions unreliable. Retraction notices are typically issued for various reasons, including scientific misconduct, genuine mistakes, or problems with peer review. This chapter provides a systematic analysis of the dubious research identified in the Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric analysis was conducted on dubious research to assess the magnitude and influence of the questionable work on the pool of knowledge. The contingency matrix between countries and Web of Science categories of retracted papers reveals correlations between certain domains and the countries. To counter this growing tendency, a multi-pronged approach is essential. Robust policies, vigilant watchdogs, and targeted interventions by institutions are necessary to uphold the integrity of scholarly literature. Academia cannot afford to remain silent in the face of this threat to its credibility.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{TRISTAN2024,

title = { Educational technologies and assessment practices: Evolution and emerging research gaps},

author = {LIM MING SOON TRISTAN and GOTTIPATI Swapna and Michelle L. F. CHEONG},

url = {https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/sis_research/9241

https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=10241&context=sis_research},

doi = {/10.4018/979-8-3693-1310-7},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-01-01},

booktitle = {Reshaping learning with next generation educational technologies},

pages = {136-172},

abstract = {This chapter examines the integration and trajectory of ubiquitous, adaptive, and immersive technologies in educational assessments, based upon qualitative predictions from Horizon Report and quantitative bibliometric analysis. Through network analysis, the authors identified key educational technological trends and their interconnectedness within the academic domain. These findings underscored the ascendance of adaptive assessments for personalized real-time feedback, the role of virtual immersive assessments adding layers of complexity, variability, and adaptability that a physical environment might not offer, and the pervasive reach of ubiquitous assessments in crafting contextually anchored evaluations. Grounded in pedagogical underpinnings, the chapter presents pressing research gaps, theoretical and practical insights, positioning itself as a useful reference for researchers and practitioners in enhancing educational technology-infused assessment strategies.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Milia2023b,

title = {Using Digital Text-Based Approaches to Study Knowledge Circulation},

author = {Matías Milia},

url = {https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781003290650-52/using-digital-text-based-approaches-study-knowledge-circulation-mat%C3%ADas-milia},

isbn = {9781003290650},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-12-31},

issue = {1},

pages = {19},

abstract = {If academic knowledge is indeed a human artefact, it is possible to assume that the collective practices that have shaped it have left traces. This chapter assembles a methodological and theoretical toolbox that allows us to take an empirical look at these traces in different textual sources. It provides some ground rules for studying these variations as digital traces in textual data. Namely, it aims to foster an analytical approach that helps newcomer scholars to fully understand and to explain how a specific set of ideas circulates, how their definitions change and the spatial and historical specificities of these variations. It provides a model workflow to address these tasks and offers insight on how to build comprehensive search strategies. To illustrate these methods, it offers three empirical case studies that showcase the kind of research that can be conducted using these tools. It thus offers a type of approach situated in the emerging field that uses digital methods and computational tools for social science research.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Lim2023d,

title = {Ethical Considerations for Artificial Intelligence in Educational Assessments},

author = {Tristan Lim and Swapna Gottipati and Michelle L. F. Cheong},

url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376951624_Ethical_Considerations_for_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Educational_Assessments},

doi = {10.4018/979-8-3693-0205-7.ch003},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-12-31},

abstract = {In the vital context of education, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) to assessments necessitates a nuanced examination of the boundaries between ethically permissible and impermissible practices. In this chapter, the authors applied a systematic literature mapping methodology to scour extant research, so as to holistically structure the landscape into explicit topical research clusters. Through topic modelling and network analyses, research mapped key ethical principles to different assessment phases in a triadic ontological framework. The chapter looks to provide researchers and practitioners the insights into the ethical challenges that exist across an end-to-end assessment pipeline.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Dubois2022,

title = {The Anthem Companion to Robert K. Merton: chapter Nine, "Providing Puzzles": Science as Norms and Values},

author = {Michel Dubois},

editor = {Charles Crothers and Lorenzo Sabetta},

url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/anthem-companion-to-robert-k-merton/providing-puzzles-science-as-norms-and-values/FDC7C6779EC32B461FA59F60778DA831},

isbn = {9781839981173},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-13},

pages = {165-182},

publisher = {Anthem Press},

chapter = {9},

abstract = {Robert King Merton has played an important role in shaping the field of sociology of science and technology. He defined the main orientations of a collective research program with his 1935 dissertation on Science, Technology and Society in 17th Century England, but even more so through his long-lasting interest in the sociological study of the practices, norms, and values of the scientific community. He succeeded where most of his mentors (Pitirim Sorokin, George Sarton) had previously failed by developing a “disciplinary program” and gathering promising students who tested and pursued some of his intuitions in multiple directions (Dubois 2014). His Columbia University seminar with Harriet Zuckerman on the sociology of science, from 1965 to 1985, played a critical role in this matter. Key contributors to the field of science study have been initially trained in this seminar. And still today the volume edited by Norman Storer for Chicago University Press in 1973—Sociolog y of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (Merton 1973)—remains an important intellectual landmark.



As we have now reached the fourth (or even the fifth) generation of professional sociologists of science, how should we consider Merton's scientific contribution? Should it be seen as a “patrimonial” component of the field? Merton would have said “Obliteration by incorporation.” I argue here that some of his insights and findings not only still benefit from unexpected visibility but also deserve a more systematic form of critical reappropriation. As one of his former research assistants, Stephen Cole (2004, 843), put it in a quasi-autobiographical essay, “with all its faults, [Merton] had the ability to arouse interest in others—interest that frequently led others to do empirical research. This is, after all, one of the major functions of theoretical work—providing puzzles.”



In this chapter, I examine some of these “Mertonian puzzles” for the study of contemporary science and technology. In the first section, I return briefly to Merton's writings to characterize the main features of his normative approach of science. In the second section, I underline some aspects of the contemporary diffusion of Merton's ideas. Finally, in the third section, I discuss how this program provides some tools to investigate empirically some of the most recent and intriguing forms of evolution in the scientific community.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Loconto2022,

title = {Gouverner par les métriques : un exercice dans l'intermédiation des connaissances },

author = {Allison Loconto },

url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-03674025},

isbn = {978-2-35671-845-7},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-01},

urldate = {2022-09-01},

booktitle = {Sciences, techniques et agricultures : gouverner pour transformer},

abstract = {The Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) plays a dual role in the governance of global food security, as both an arena for policy debate and as a 'universal' knowledge institution. FAO defines itself as a 'neutral knowledge broker'. One of the instruments used to achieve this is the annual flagship publication: The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World (SOFI). It is the global reference report on developments in the fight against hunger and tracks progress made towards the achievement of the goal of food and nutrition security. The 2017 SOFI Report marks an important turning point in the history of food security reporting. On the one hand, it observed that the decline in the Prevalence of Undernourishment (PoU), observed over the previous 10 years, had probably been reversed. On the other hand, it introduced new metrics that would enable FAO reporting to also report on progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). An important change is that it proposed a subjective measure of food insecurity, the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES), whereas, until then, the PoU proposed an "objective" measure based on a balance between availability and estimated needs. Based on a lexical analysis of SOFI reports and an ethnography within the FAO, the objective of this chapter is to shed light on the relationship between quantification techniques and global policies. By developing the concept of knowledge intermediation and its infrastructures, an original reflection is presented about how governance through metrics can affect our ways of knowing about food security. },

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Noël2021,

title = {Remaining Central and Interdisciplinary: Conditions for Success of a Research Speciality at the University of Strasbourg (1961-2011)},

author = {Marianne Noël},

editor = {Karen Kastenhofer and Susan Molyneux-Hodgson},

url = {https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-61728-8_2.pdf},

doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_2},

isbn = {978-3-030-61728-8},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-03-23},

urldate = {2021-03-23},

booktitle = {Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences},

volume = {31},

pages = {41-64},

publisher = {Springer International Publishing},

address = {Cham},

abstract = {Supramolecular chemistry (SMC), at the interface between chemistry, physics and biology, is a research domain which has grown considerably in the last 40 years. Jean-Marie Lehn was the first to lay its foundations and formalise its concepts, in a seminal article published in 1978. This work earned him the 1987 Nobel Prize for Chemistry, which he shared with Charles J. Pedersen (DuPont) and Donald J. Cram (UCLA). The development of SMC has led to the creation of a dedicated institute and a new building on the university campus. In this chapter, the emergence of supramolecular chemistry as a paradigm and research speciality at the University of Strasbourg (France) is reconstructed with a focus on Lehn's central role in this process, proposing a three-period chronology based on Mullins' sequential model (1972). It is furthermore argued that the creation of a physical space, with particular architecture and functions, has also played a key role in consolidating what is now called the ``Strasbourg's chemistry''. The (multi)disciplinary character of SMC is discussed in reference to the concept of ``new disciplinarity'' put forward by Marcovich and Shinn (Soc Sci Inf 50(3--4):582--6062011, Toward a new dimension: exploring the nanoscale. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Raimbault2021,

title = {The Emergence of Technoscientific Fields and the New Political Sociology of Science},

author = {Benjamin Raimbault and Pierre-Benoit Joly},

editor = {Karen Kastenhofer and Susan Molyneux-Hodgson},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_4},

doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_4},

isbn = {978-3-030-61728-8},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-03-23},

urldate = {2021-03-23},

booktitle = {Community and Identity in Contemporary Technosciences},

volume = {31},

pages = {85--106},

publisher = {Springer International Publishing},

address = {Cham},

abstract = {This chapter conceptualizes the emergence of a techno-scientific field (TSF) as a multiscalar and progressive establishment of a new set of epistemic and social rules. Drawing on science and technology studies and field theories, we design an original conceptual framework that allows us to formulate three propositions to characterize the process of emergence of a TSF. We use the emergence of synthetic biology (Synbio) as a `laboratory' to test this framework. Each proposition refers to a determinant dimension in the process of emergence---heterogeneity, hierarchy, and autonomy. First, we claim that heterogeneity (of disciplines, research questions, visions, social norms) is constitutive of the emergence of a new TSF. Second, the population of Synbio researchers is highly stratified; a core group of scientific entrepreneurs (incumbents and challengers) plays an active role in the process of emergence. Third, strategies for the control of external resources are crucial to the structuration of the field, which is mirrored by the prominent role of core-group members as boundary spanners. An original scientometric approach is used to create specific variables that allow us to investigate both network and field structural dynamics bridging qualitative and quantitative approaches.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Juárez2021,

title = {Performing an Invisibility Spell Exploring the media’s discourse on human migration in the aftermath of the Kerala floods and landslides of 2019},

author = {Víctor José Sánchez Juárez},

url = {https://www.belspo.be/belspo/brain-be/projects/FinalReports/MIGRADAPT_SEM2020.pdf

https://www.hugo.uliege.be/cms/c_7041964/en/the-state-of-environmental-migration-2020-a-review-of-2019},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-03-01},

urldate = {2021-03-01},

booktitle = {The State of Environmental Migration 2020 A review of 2019},

pages = {39-59},

publisher = {Presses Universitaires de Liège},

abstract = {Kerala is a Southern Indian state which underwent major floods and landslides in August 2018 and in August 2019 (see Images 2.1 and 2.2). According to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (IDMC), 2,675,000 disaster-related internal displacements occurred in India during 2018, of which more than half – about 1.5 million – were recorded in Kerala following the 2018 floods (IDMC, 2019). Data for new disaster-re- lated internal displacements in the country for 2019 amounted to 5 million (IDMC, 2020). Regarding the displacement linked to the 2019 Kerala floods, it is estimated that, by the end of August 2019, 251,000 Keralites had sought refuge in 1,639 relief camps across Southern India (India Today, 2019).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Salazar2020,

title = {La RICYT cómo comunidad de práctica: ¿cómo de ha conformado en 25 años?},

author = {Mónica Salazar and Sandra Carolina Rivera-Torres},

url = {http://www.ricyt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/ElEstadoDeLaCiencia_2020.pdf},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-11-17},

booktitle = {EL ESTADO DE LA CIENCIA Principales Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología Iberoamericanos / Interamericanos 2020},

pages = {49-56},

abstract = {In addition to its regular sections, this year The State of Science commemorates RICYT’s 25 years with a special dossier of reflections on the production and use of science and technology indicators in Latin America. It has a foreword by Mariano Jabonero, Secretary General of the OEI, a special contribution by Manuel Heitor, Minister of Science, Technology and Higher Education of Portugal, and reflections by Lidia Brito, Director of the Regional Office of Sciences for Latin America and the UNESCO Caribbean. Representatives of UIS-UNESCO, OECD, IDB and OAS also participate, along with different experts who have accompanied the trajectory of RICYT.

This publication is the result of the joint effort of the participating countries of the network, which provide the statistical information included in this volume, and of an active community of experts in indicators, accompanied by different international organizations that support the network.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Struck-Kachani2019,

title = {Familles et Trouble du spectre de l'autisme},

author = {Alexandra Struk Kachani},

url = {https://www.dunod.com/sciences-humaines-et-sociales/familles-et-trouble-du-spectre-autisme},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-11-01},

publisher = {Dunod},

chapter = {2},

abstract = {Le Trouble du Spectre de l’Autisme (TSA) représente la deuxième pathologie neuro-developpementale la plus fréquente chez l’enfant. Ce handicap, présent tout au long de la vie, a des conséquences majeures sur le fonctionnement de la personne, mais aussi sur l’entourage familial et notamment les parents. Alors qu’il est fréquent d’entendre parler du «  retard français  » dans le champ de l’autisme, cet ouvrage recense de façon inédite des travaux de recherche nationaux sur les problématiques rencontrées par les familles afin de mieux les comprendre et les accompagner.

Il met en lumière les évolutions sociales de la place des familles de personnes avec un TSA (parents, couple, fratrie, grands-parents), leurs besoins et adaptation au quotidien, le partenariat parents-professionnels et enfin les dispositifs de soutien et d’accompagnement. Il donne également la parole à des professionnels et chercheurs, œuvrant sur l’ensemble du territoire français, mais aussi à des familles et associations.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{elJamal2018,

title = {Framing Arab Poverty Knowledge Production: A Socio-bibliometric Study},

author = {Sarah el Jamal and Sari Hanafi},

url = {https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2169/45489cad9888d522020e2caea2da13053770.pdf},

year  = {2018},

date = {2018-04-28},

booktitle = {Facing An Unequal World: Challenges for Global Sociology},

pages = {175-194},

chapter = {14},

series = {SAGE Studies in International Sociology},

abstract = {Based on Mannheim’s theory (1936) that knowledge is socially constructed, and  its  production  process  is  influenced  by  the  social  context  in  which  it  occurs,  this  study  seeks  to  identify  and  analyze  the  social  influences  and forces behind the knowledge produced and disseminated in the form of  academic  journal  articles  on  the  topic  of  poverty  in  the  Arab  World.  Certain features and elements of the final body of knowledge (the articles) will be taken as telling indicators of the process in hindsight. These will be  the  basis  of  three  kinds  of  analyses  that  will  be  carried  out:  content  analysis, authorship analysis, and citation analysis. In content analysis, I will scrutinize the poverty concepts used, the methodologies applied, the use of theory, including theoretical frameworks of the studies, the prevail-ing political and epistemological paradigms, the structure of the articles, and the types of articles (critique, essay, fieldwork). In authorship analysis, I  will  survey  the  sociological  markers  pertaining  to  the  authors  and  institutions producing the articles. In citation analysis, I will analyze the characteristics and trends of the references. Ultimately, I seek to answer the following: What are the social factors conditioning the production of academic articles on poverty in the Arab World, and what are the observed trends thereof?},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Bouabid2017,

title = {Les partenaires internationaux du Maroc: analyse et cartographie des co-signatures avec les chercheurs étrangers},

author = {Hamid Bouabid and Pier Luigi Rossi and Jacques Gaillard},

editor = {Jacques Gaillard and Hamid Bouabid},

url = {http://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010069762

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315729996_Chapitre_3_-_Les_partenaires_internationaux_du_Maroc_analyse_et_cartographie_des_co-signatures_avec_les_chercheurs_etrangers},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-03-01},

urldate = {2017-03-01},

booktitle = {La recherche scientifique au Maroc et son internationalisation},

pages = {67-93},

chapter = {3},

abstract = {Ce chapitre propose une analyse rétrospective de l’internationalisation de la recherche marocaine et de son positionnement dans les clusters scientifiques régionaux à travers le prisme des publications du Maroc co-signées avec le reste du monde. Cette approche bilatérale est complétée dans une deuxième partie par une l’analyse des collaborations internationales du Maroc au sein des cluster (réseaux) arabes, africains et méditerranéens. Au cours des trente dernières années, la production scientifique marocaine se caractérise par une internationalisation marquée avec un niveau de publications signées avec des auteurs étrangers toujours supérieur à 50% en dépit du caractère fortement endogène des sciences médicales, lesquelles représente près de 40% de la production totale du Maroc. Ce niveau d’internationalisation varie en fonction des disciplines et des institutions. Il est comparable à celui de la plupart des « petits » pays scientifiques européens et assez proche de celui de la plupart des pays arabes. En dépit d’un recul en valeur relative depuis la fin des années 1990, la France, qui co-signe aujourd’hui environ 30% de la production scientifique marocaine, reste de loin le principal partenaire scientifique du Maroc et ceci pour l’ensemble des domaines scientifiques. L’Espagne, partenaire de 8,5% des co-publications, lesquelles sont en progression constante depuis les trente dernières années, s’affirme aujourd’hui comme le deuxième partenaire scientifique, suivi de l’Allemagne et des Etats-Unis, lesquels, jadis en deuxième position après la France, sont aujourd’hui le cinquième partenaire juste après l’Italie. L’Arabie saoudite, quasi inexistante dans les co-publications internationales marocaines jusqu’à la fin du siècle dernier, se classe en sixième position à quasi égalité avec les Etats-Unis et dépasse légèrement la Tunisie. Les autres pays appartenant aux douze principaux partenaires du Maroc (Canada, Algérie, Royaume uni, Portugal, Belgique) présentent des taux de co-publications autour de 2,5 % de la production scientifique marocaine avec, généralement, des progressions sur la dernière période. L’analyse des clusters scientifiques régionaux montre que le positionnement du Maroc demeure excentré dans le cluster scientifique arabe et africain et donc en décalage avec les ambitions partenariales du Maroc avec l’Afrique. En revanche, le Maroc est mieux positionné dans le cluster méditerranéen avec une bonne proximité avec le tryptique France-Italie-Espagne qui domine le paysage des collaborations scientifiques internationales dans cette région.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{bouabid7cooperation,

title = {Coopération scientifique et co-publications: le cas de l’Université Mohammed VC Souissi},

author = {Hamid Bouabid and Radouane Mrabet},

url = {http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers17-04/010069759.pdf#page=187},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

urldate = {2017-01-01},

booktitle = {La recherche scientifique au Maroc et son internationalisation},

pages = {181-200},

publisher = {Editions universitaires européennes},

chapter = {7},

abstract = {Ce chapitre présente une évaluation de la politique de coopération scientifique au niveau de l’Université Mohammed V – Souissi (UM5S) en considérant d’une part les accords de coopération comme intrants et d’autre part les co-publications et leurs citations comme extrants. La cartographie de réseaux de proximité des institutions en fonction des disciplines scientifiques est utilisée pour visualiser les réseaux de coopération, la pluridisciplinarité à travers le croisement des institutions partenaires et les domaines scientifiques traités et enfin la pertinence de ces domaines en les projetant sur les domaines de pointe tels que répertoriés dans Science Watch de Thomson Reuters.

La compilation analytique des résultats à partir des métriques précédents a permis de catégoriser les institutions partenaires en 3 classes. La première, composée d’institutions avec lesquelles l’UM5S dispose d’accords de coopération et co-publie, peut être considérée comme cohérente en soi. La coopération avec ce groupe d’institutions mérite d’être davantage fidélisée et intensifiée. La deuxième catégorie est constituée d’institutions avec lesquelles il y a un volume substantiel de co-publications sans qu’aucun accord formel de coopération n’existe. Il est fortement suggéré que l’UM5S formalise sa coopération scientifique avec ses institutions selon une approche « bottom-up » afin de permettre à ses chercheurs de renforcer leur recherche collaborative. La troisième catégorie regroupe les institutions de pays émergents (en termes économique et scientifique) tels que la Chine, l’Inde, le Brésil et la Turquie, identifiées comme citant largement la production scientifique de l’UM5S. Cette dernière devrait considérer ces institutions comme un réservoir de partenariat potentiel pour une coopération scientifique future.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{cardon2017fragmentation,

title = {The Fragmentation of Plant and Food Biosecurity Research Networks: A Scientometric Analysis},

author = {Vincent Cardon and Marc Barbier},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46897-6_14},

year  = {2017},

date = {2017-01-01},

urldate = {2017-01-01},

booktitle = {Practical Tools for Plant and Food Biosecurity},

volume = {8},

pages = {289-308},

publisher = {Springer},

abstract = {Scientometric analysis based on the mapping of complex networks performed with the Cortext manager platform reveals that biosecurity and bioterrorism have established research communities and literature, in which plant and crop biosecurity are by far less represented than human and animal issues. Biosecurity has not made plant health “disappear” and/or does not constitute a rival field of research. The conceptual apparatus of biosecurity is close to that of some other fields of research on plant health. Some specific consistent clusters of scientists and concepts related to biosecurity and agro-terrorism can be isolated however, in particular the members of the PlantFoodSec Network of Excellence. This result demonstrates the impact of European and international programs (such as CropBioTerror, PlantFoodSec, etc.) on the structure of research networks on agro-terrorism. The article opens with an analysis of qualitative material regarding the way this scientific production and agenda permeates (or not) through daily professional activities. Focusing on plant biosecurity and agro-terrorism, it targets some common issues in scientometrics and sociology of science about the boundaries of research domains and the emergence of new paradigms with specific concepts, methods, authors and cited references. It also echoes the range of questions and reflections at stake within the scientific communities related to biosecurity, and shows the effects of expertise-driven processes on the dynamics of knowledge.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{fausto2016scientific,

title = {Scientific Literature on Twitter as a subject research: findings based on bibliometric analysis},

author = {Sibele Fausto and Pascal Aventurier},

url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01297804/},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

urldate = {2016-01-01},

booktitle = {Handbook Twitter For Research 2015 – 2016},

pages = {242},

publisher = {EMLYON Press},

abstract = {Since its launch in 2006, Internet platform Twitter has rapidly expanded. As a phenomenon of the digital era, Twitter generates a new type of research data that has received a good deal of attention in the academic literature. It has turned into a popular subject research that has been widely investigated in the academic world in different fields ranging from the Social Sciences to Health Sciences, addressing various questions, methods approaches, and covering multiple data sets. This study provides some findings of a bibliometric study which was conducted to describe the scientific literature available on Twitter with descriptive, quantitative information and also in a qualitative approach, in addition to the previous studies and designed as a contribution to a broader picture of how the evolution of the current scientific literature about Twitter is related to bibliographic data sets. Results show a variety of findings that can provide a better comprehension of this social media platform which evolved from a data source for the research to, nowadays, being a research subject itself },

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{baya2016mapping,

title = {Mapping Topics in International Climate Negotiations: A Computer-Assisted Semantic Network Approach},

author = {Nicolas Baya-Laffite and Jean-Philippe Cointet},

url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-40700-5_14},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

urldate = {2016-01-01},

booktitle = {Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research},

pages = {273-291},

publisher = {Springer},

abstract = {Baya-Laffite and Cointet map the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) negotiations topic structure and evolution over 20 years using a digital corpus from the most renowned internal journal of the negotiations available online, the Earth Negotiations Bulletin (ENB). The authors’ methodological strategy combines text mining, network analysis and data visualization tools. The chapter shows how this mixed-method strategy applied to a digital corpus drawn from the ENB website, makes it possible to map climate change negotiations. Mixing traditional research methods and computer-assisted techniques, as well as manual and automated operations results in a series of unique new visual syntheses of the UNFCCC process. Narrating the visualizations allows distant readings of topics’ semantic structure and topic trajectories and thereby to test the robustness of the maps as well as the tools and methods used to produce them.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Tancoigne2016,

title = {Evolution of a concept: a scientometric analysis of RRI},

author = {Elise Tancoigne and Sally Randles and Pierre-Benoît Joly},

editor = {Ralf Lindner and Stefan Kuhlmann and Sally Randles and Bjørn Bedsted and Guido Gorgoni and Erich Griessler and Allison Loconto and Niels Mejlgaard},

url = {http://irihs.ihs.ac.at/3909/1/urn_nbn_de_0011-n-3829371-3.pdf},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

booktitle = {Navigating Towards Shared Responsibility in Research and Innovation: Approach, Process and Results of the Res-AGorA Project},

pages = {40-45},

abstract = {Political scientists have considered the complex interac-tions between words and power for a long time. The power of words lies not only in the performativity of language – a typical situation where saying something is doing some-thing – but covers a wide range of means related to sense making, issue framing, and the control of perception and the interpretation of reality. The importance of words of power (meaning powerful actors) may be identified in different mundane operations of political life (i.e. when spin doctors elaborate elements of language) and through well-known operations such as labelling or storytelling. These strong interactions between words and power have been taken into account in various streams of public policy analysis (Fischer 2003). They are also a central theme of policy fiction such as George Orwell’s 1984 which points out the role of “Newspeak” in totalitarian states. Hence, the appearance of new expressions in policy discourse ought to be considered as a symptom of crisis and / or of potential key changes. The case of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is interesting for its own sake but also since it illustrates the key role of the European Com-mission as a political entrepreneur which heavily draws on discourse framing (Schmidt and Radaelli 2004). In this chapter, we question the power of RRI words as well as the use of RRI by powerful institutions. What is the power of RRI, i.e. (to say it roughly) a tool for recasting governance of research and innovation or a tool for washing responsi-bility (Randles et al. 2014)? Who are the actors who define /discuss / promote RRI?},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Aventurier2015,

title = {Estudo cientométrico dos Congressos Brasileiros de Agroecologia},

author = {Pascal Aventurier and Guillaume Ollivier and Maria Cleofas Faggion de Alencar and Stéphane Bellon},

url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01181041/},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

urldate = {2015-01-01},

booktitle = {Redes de agroecologias : experiênçias no Brasil e na França},

pages = {248},

abstract = {A produção técnico-científica internacional em Agroecologia, cuja fundamentação está ancorada nas bases de dados bibliográficas internacionais, o Web of Science (WoS) e o Scopus. Quando começamos a estudar a produção internacional, encontramos menos de 150 textos de pesquisadores brasileiros em mais de 2.500 artigos em Agroecologia (OLLIVIER et al., 2011, ALENCAR; AVENTURIER, 2013), que representa um número pequeno em relação à dinâmica de produção de conhecimento em Agroecologia no Brasil. A análise de Alencar e Aventurier, em 2014, mostrou que existem mais de 8.000 textos sobre o assunto publicados em congressos, artigos de revistas, dissertações e teses que estão sendo coletados e armazenados para estudos dos projetos “Repositório de acesso livre para agroecologia e agricultura orgânica do Brasil” (FAPESP, projeto 2009/54940-9) e “Agroecologia na França e no Brasil: entre redes científicas, movimentos sociais e políticas públicas” (CAPES/COFECUB, projeto 716/2011). Embora a história da Agroecologia no Brasil tenha se manifestado com abundância de atividades, principalmente nos congressos em agroecologia, a sua visibilidade não corresponde à dinâmica da produção técnico-científica internacional (ALENCAR, AVENTURIER, 2013). },

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{Chavalarias2015,

title = {Thematic Domination of Media Framing},

author = {David Chavalarias and Jean-Philippe Cointet and Lise Cornilleau and Tan Kiem Duong and Andrei Mogoutov and Lionel Villard and Camille Roth and Savy Thierry},

url = {https://cns.iu.edu//docs/handouts/Atlas_of_Knowledge_Flyer_hi.pdf},

year  = {2015},

date = {2015-01-01},

booktitle = {Atlas of Knowledge Anyone Can Map},

pages = {17},

abstract = {Text-mining network analysis tools are used to identify the key themes discussed in the press at a given period. Each article is then associated with these automatically reconstructed topics whether they correspond to concerns expressed at the local level, or general statements and action at national/international level. These news items are also geo-located both by the origin of the story and the places mentioned in the story enabling to map how a given theme or issue is distributed over the world. Moreover, themes identified at successive time steps are reconnected into streams of content. A stream visualization illustrates how topics articulate through time. An online interface allows to visualize these maps, themes and news entries and to answer questions such as : Is an issue – concerning for example the impact of climatic change on food security – attracting more attention with time? How this specific issue relates with contiguous subjects (use of biofuel for example) ? Does the climatic change issue observed at a given time stem from, possibly various, past issue framing or is it a completely emergent topic ?},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}

@inbook{gibbon2014breast,

title = {From BRCA to BRCAness: tales of translational research},

author = {Pascale Bourret and Peter Keating and Alberto Cambrosio},

url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264556063_From_BRCA_to_BRCAness_tales_of_translational_research},

year  = {2014},

date = {2014-01-01},

booktitle = {Breast Cancer Gene Research and Medical Practices: Transnational Perspectives in the time of BRCA},

pages = {175-193},

publisher = {Routledge},

abstract = {The discovery of the two inherited susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the mid-1990s created the possibility of predictive genetic testing and led to the establishment of specific medical programmes for those at high risk of developing breast cancer in the UK, US and Europe. In the intervening fifteen years, the medical institutionalisation of these knowledge-practices and accompanying medical techniques for assessing and managing risk have advanced at a rapid pace across multiple national and transnational arenas, whilst also themselves constituting a highly mobile and shifting terrain.



This unique edited collection brings together cross-disciplinary social science research to present a broad global comparative understanding of the implications of BRCA gene research and medical practices. With a focus on time-economies that unfold locally, nationally and transnationally (including in Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Italy, the UK and the USA), the essays in this volume facilitate a re-reading of concepts such as prevention, kinship and heredity, and together offer a unique, timely and comparative perspective on these developments.

The book provides a coherent structure for examining the diversity of practices and discourses that surround developments linked to BRCA genetics, and to the evolving field of genetics more broadly. It will be of interest to students and scholars of anthropology, sociology, history of science, STS, public health and bioethics.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {inbook}

}