CorText Manager around the world

@article{Chiffoleau2024,

title = {Reversing the trend of agrobiodiversity decline by co-developing food chains with consumers: A European survey for change},

author = {Yuna Chiffoleau and Tara Dourian and Géraldine Enderli and Dalia Mattioni and Grégori Akermann and Allison Loconto and Francesca Galli and Gulyás Emese and Zsófia Perényi and Luca Colombo and Sonia Massari and Dominique Desclaux},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924000575},

doi = {/10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.032},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-02-22},

abstract = {Agrobiodiversity is in rapid decline, due to the intensification of agriculture and the development of food value chains based on industrial processing techniques. However, consumers are not generally involved in developing solutions to reverse this trend and their relation to agrobiodiversity remains largely unknown. As part of a European project, and with the aim of involving consumers in guiding research, innovation and policies, a large online survey (n=2,397) and focus groups (n= 82) were carried out in seven countries to gather consumers’ preferences and aversions regarding the use of agrobiodiversity in food chains in relation to their environmental concerns, food consumption practices and knowledge. Using the majority judgment approach typically used to improve political votes, different options for using of agrobiodiversity in food chains were proposed to citizen-consumers. Results first showed that the decline of agrobiodiversity is a concern for consumers, but does not guide food choices. Then, the alternative options for using agrobiodiversity in food chains, previously documented as favourable to its conservation and development, received positive votes from a large majority of respondents, regardless of their socio-economic category. However, the research showed that respondents seem to have limited knowledge on the subject. This study calls for more research and policies to support alternative options for using agrobiodiversity in food chains. It also encourages the co-development of agrobiodiversity-based markets with citizen-consumers as well as the creation of food environments conducive to learning on agrobiodiversity.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Malanski2022b,

title = {International research on labor in agri-food value chains: A bibliometric review from web of science},

author = {Priscila Duarte Malanski and Sandra Mara de Alencar Schiavi and Benoît Dedieu and Julio Cesar Damasceno},

url = {https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03833144/document},

doi = {https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.852178},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-09-01},

urldate = {2022-09-01},

journal = {Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems},

volume = {6},

pages = {852178},

abstract = {Value chains are an important driver for the current labor dynamics in the agri-food sector, and agri-food value chain sustainability strongly depends on decent work conditions. An increasing literature body have been investigated the interactions between chain agents and how it impacted labor issues. Our aim was to map the scientific landscape of the scientific knowledge on labor in agri-food value chains. We performed a bibliometric review of 343 articles indexed in the Web of Science based on descriptive and network analysis of articles metadata, which covered authors, journals, citation times, keywords and countries. We showed that labor in agri-food value chains has an international audience, despite that knowledge production was largely built by a restraint leading scientific network. Overall, the scientific knowledge is organized into four main research domains on labor in agri-food value chains: (1) labor governance in global value chains through standards, (2) employment in value chains and impacts on socioeconomic conditions of rural areas, (3) gender issues and value chains, (4) labor and upgrading in global value chains. The controversies in the international literature regarding labor issues in the agri-food value chains, and blind spots of current research are discussed.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Guimarães2022,

title = {Governance in agrifood global value chain: the scientific field in the recent 15 years},

author = {Amanda Ferreira Guimarães and Priscila Duarte Malanski and Sandra Mara de Alencar Schiavi and Mélise Dantas Machado Bouroullec},

url = {https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Amanda-Guimaraes-3/publication/359789127_Governance_in_agrifood_global_value_chain_a_bibliometric_analysis_of_the_past_15_years/links/624ea4f1b0cee02d6957f6f6/Governance-in-agrifood-global-value-chain-a-bibliometric-analysis-of-the-past-15-years.pdf},

doi = {10.1590/1806-9479.2022.260595},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-25},

urldate = {2022-07-25},

journal = {Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural},

abstract = {Sustainable agrifood global value chains depend on chain governance by the lead firm and transaction governance. However, the link between them is still unclear. We therefore investigated the scientific field on “governance in agrifood global value chain” over 15 years in the Scopus and Web of Science databases through two analyses: a descriptive bibliometric and a keywords co-occurrence analysis. Our descriptive results show that the research on the theme has increased over the years, with a concentration of the papers published in countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, with emphasis on Wageningen University. The network graph showed a multidisciplinary theoreticomplcal field and four axes: chain governance; transaction governance; horizontal relationships; political and structural elements. The chain and the transaction governance are indirectly linked by the concept of upgrading, compromising sustainability’s holistic view. Although the sustainability of the chain depends on both levels of governance, this bibliometric study showed that there is a gap to be filled in this topic. We propose a study in the light of both concepts, considering upgrading, vertical and horizontal relationships, as well as public policies.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Malanski2021,

title = {Labor in agrifood value chains: a scientometric review from Scopus},

author = {Priscila Duarte Malanski and Sandra Mara de Alencar Schiavi and Benoît Dedieu and Julio Cesar Damasceno},

url = {https://www.wageningenacademic.com/doi/pdf/10.22434/IFAMR2021.0066},

doi = {10.22434/IFAMR2021.0066},

year  = {2021},

date = {2021-12-24},

urldate = {2021-12-24},

journal = {International Food and Agribusiness Management Review},

pages = {1-20},

abstract = {Addressing labor issues is crucial to agrifood value chain analysis, improvements and sustainability.

However, the specific contribution of value chain approaches to discussions on labor in agriculture is still a research gap. To fill this gap, we reviewed the international literature on labor in agrifood value chains. We performed a scientometric analysis of the articles indexed in Scopus, which was composed by a bibliometric, diachronic and synchronic analysis. The main results show that labor in agrifood value chains is a relative new scientific community. Researchers’ interest evolved around three hotspots over the past 20 years, and five consolidated research domains. Our review provides an overview about the main characteristics of a rising scientific community, and a synthesis of knowledge produced to support scientific innovation on labor in agrifood value chains. Regarding chain agents, our results stress the importance of governance for improving employment and working conditions to promote chain sustainability.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Malanski2020b,

title = {Mapping the research domains on work in agriculture. A bibliometric review from Scopus database},

author = {Priscila Duarte Malanski and Benoît Dedieu and Sandra Mara de Alencar Schiavi},

url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016720311864},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.050},

issn = {0743-0167},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-10-27},

urldate = {2020-10-27},

journal = {Journal of Rural Studies},

abstract = {Near to half of world population lives in rural areas, and agriculture is responsible for 28% of global employment. Structural changes in agriculture impacting labor and the low attractivity of employment and working conditions in this sector are the major issues for the permanence and renewal of the rural workforce. Promoting decent work is essential to reach sustainable development. According to the ILO definition, decent work involves a wide range of conditions linked between them that include and go beyond farming work (e.g. gender equity, workplace security, fair income, among others). This complex situation requires for scientists the analysis of the diverse topics, as well as the development of interdisciplinary approaches to deal with this diversity. A review of the scientific literature is necessary to summarize the knowledge that has been produced and identify the current trends related to work in agriculture. In order to provide a background in this topic, the aim of this study was to review the state of the international literature related to work in agriculture, through a bibliometric analysis of scientific articles indexed in Scopus bibliographical database. Our findings show that USA, UK, France and China are the leaders in the scientific landscape according to: geographical production of knowledge, main journals and authors, and most-cited articles. The analysis of work in agriculture is declined in five main research domains: 1) social issues in rural areas; 2) labor market; 3) household strategies of labor allocation, 4) work organization in livestock farms; and 5) occupational health in farms. These research domains are investigated by four main scientific communities that prevail in the international literature: 1) agricultural economics; 2) ergonomics; 3) social issues for rural development; and 5) livestock farming systems. Besides those mainstream research, three major research trends emerged: 1) migration and precarious employment condition; 2) work issues in advisory services; and 3) labor governance in global value chains. These trends reflect ongoing transformations in agriculture that are important to think about the future of the work in this sector and its impacts on sustainable development. We show for the first time the characteristics of the main scientific communities that have performed the most relevant research indexed in Scopus database related to work in agriculture over the past 10 years. This review offers an overview in an interdisciplinary topic, and provides a benchmark for future cutting-edge research. The ILO definition of decent work can be a guideline for focus and deepen specific topics, since our findings indicate that several of them are linked to work-related issues in agriculture, which could support sustainable development on this sector.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}