CorText Manager around the world

@article{Barraud2025,

title = {The changing meaning of wild rivers: A review},

author = {Régis Barraud},

url = {https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/tp1-2/1916-vol18/378-issue18-2

https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/volume-18/v18issue2/787-a18-2-12/file},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-12-31},

journal = {Water Alternatives},

volume = {18},

issue = {2},

pages = {181-213},

abstract = {Environmental activism has been instrumental in the adoption of public policies to protect the last remaining free-flowing rivers. In this regard, the passage of the 1968 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act in the United States is an internationally recognised milestone. This legislation continues to inspire both other campaigns to protect wild rivers and the development of new conservation measures. The primary objective of this review is to provide a reconstruction of the trajectory of wild rivers as scientific subject matter. This approach allows us to study the processes of diffusion and adaptation of the American Wild and Scenic Rivers Act in other geographical contexts. It also aims to help us better understand the social and political effects of public policies that are geared towards the preservation of wild rivers. To this end, 106 scientific articles on wild rivers covering the period 1967 to 2024 were subjected to a lexical analysis (Step 1), a thematic analysis (Step 2) and a discussion of key issues based on an in-depth reading (Step 3). This review shows that the recreational, cultural and emotional values associated with wild rivers are increasingly being replaced in the scientific literature with the ecological values of free-flowing rivers. Furthermore, while the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act still largely guides scientific research on the subject, this review identifies the controversies underlying its adoption/adaptation in other colonial contexts where the idea of wilderness plays a key role in conservation. Underlying these conflicts is the need to rethink river conservation initiatives based on Indigenous people’s ontologies.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Cricchio2025,

title = {Balancing openness and ownership: open innovation strategies for AI development},

author = {Jacopo Cricchio},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2024-0470},

doi = {10.1108/EJIM-04-2024-0470},

issn = {1460-1060},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-09-23},

journal = {European Journal of Innovation Management},

address = {Pisa, Italy},

school = {Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Institute of Management},

abstract = {This paper explores how firms configure open innovation (OI) strategies when integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into their innovation models. Through the case of Baidu, it examines how OI contributes to business model innovation, highlighting how firms navigate the tension between openness and ownership in AI development.Adopting an exploratory case study approach, the research employs big data analysis methods, including thematic network and collaboration cluster analyses. These methods are applied to a comprehensive dataset of granted patents and scientific publications spanning 2000 to 2023, sourced from Orbis intellectual property and Web of Science databases.The analysis reveals a dual OI configuration: Baidu engages openly in scientific collaborations to foster value creation, while relying on centralized patenting strategies to secure value capture. This modular approach reflects a dynamic governance of knowledge across research and patenting domains. Baidu structures its AI innovation through selective openness, enabling agile adaptation in a rapidly evolving technological landscape.This study contributes to research on AI, OI, business model innovation and dynamic capabilities by illustrating how hybrid openness strategies function as organizational mechanisms for sensing, seizing and transforming. It offers interpretive insights into the design tensions of OI and provides a grounded perspective on how firms strategically navigate collaboration, protection and innovation in data-intensive contexts.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Chiffoleau2024,

title = {Reversing the trend of agrobiodiversity decline by co-developing food chains with consumers: A European survey for change},

author = {Yuna Chiffoleau and Tara Dourian and Géraldine Enderli and Dalia Mattioni and Grégori Akermann and Allison Loconto and Francesca Galli and Gulyás Emese and Zsófia Perényi and Luca Colombo and Sonia Massari and Dominique Desclaux},

url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924000575},

doi = {/10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.032},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-02-22},

abstract = {Agrobiodiversity is in rapid decline, due to the intensification of agriculture and the development of food value chains based on industrial processing techniques. However, consumers are not generally involved in developing solutions to reverse this trend and their relation to agrobiodiversity remains largely unknown. As part of a European project, and with the aim of involving consumers in guiding research, innovation and policies, a large online survey (n=2,397) and focus groups (n= 82) were carried out in seven countries to gather consumers’ preferences and aversions regarding the use of agrobiodiversity in food chains in relation to their environmental concerns, food consumption practices and knowledge. Using the majority judgment approach typically used to improve political votes, different options for using of agrobiodiversity in food chains were proposed to citizen-consumers. Results first showed that the decline of agrobiodiversity is a concern for consumers, but does not guide food choices. Then, the alternative options for using agrobiodiversity in food chains, previously documented as favourable to its conservation and development, received positive votes from a large majority of respondents, regardless of their socio-economic category. However, the research showed that respondents seem to have limited knowledge on the subject. This study calls for more research and policies to support alternative options for using agrobiodiversity in food chains. It also encourages the co-development of agrobiodiversity-based markets with citizen-consumers as well as the creation of food environments conducive to learning on agrobiodiversity.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Herrera-Pavo2022b,

title = {Participatory design of a Pedagogical Model for the Ecuadorian Educational System},

author = {Miguel Ángel Herrera-Pavo and Verónica Orellana Navarrete and José Daniel Espinosa Rodríguez and Yadhira Espinoza-Weaver},

url = {http://scielo.senescyt.gob.ec/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2588-09692022000200093&nrm=iso},

doi = {10.31095/podium.2022.42.6},

issn = {1390-5473},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-11-15},

urldate = {2022-11-15},

journal = {Podium},

volume = {42},

pages = {93–116},

publisher = {scielo},

abstract = {The need for a pedagogical model consistent with the foundations of the latest educational reforms and the public policy developed by the Ministry of Education in Ecuador prompted the reflection and collaborative construction included in this work. As a result, between June 2020 and January 2021, with the participation of teachers, critical actors in the education system, and decision-makers, a virtual co-design process was developed that began with a reflective dialogue and allowed the creation and subsequent discussion of a prototype, as well as the design of a set of strategies for its implementation. Based on the development of the joint activity, the resulting pedagogical model merged public policy's interests with teachers' contextualized vision and proved to be open and flexible enough to guide the teaching and learning processes in public educational institutions throughout the country.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Ruhua2022,

title = {Research on Open Government Data Utilizationat Home and Abroad: Progress and Trends},

author = {Huang Ruhua and Huang Yuting and Li Ya},

url = {http://qbzl.ruc.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1543.shtml},

doi = {/10.12154/j.qbzlgz.2022.04.001},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-07-01},

urldate = {2022-07-01},

volume = {43},

number = {5-15},

issue = {4},

school = {Huang Ruhua Huang Yuting (Wuhan University) and Li Ya (Soochow University)},

abstract = {[Purpose/significance] The Open Government Data (OGD) movement has stimulated the opening and sharing of government data significantly. Data use, reuse, distribution, and value creation, is the next vital step in the global OGD movement. Summarizing current research progress in OGD utilization would lay a foundation for follow-up re? search and provide theoretical support for future practice.

[Method/process] This paper intends to explore the development trends and future perspectives of OGD utilization research mainly based on research articles from both China and abroad. Grey literature (i.e., related government documents, meeting minutes, important institution/project reports)are also analyzed to demonstrate a more holistic scenario. First, the development trend and topic distribution of OGD utilization research are discussed. Then, this article clarifies Chinese and international research progress from three aspects of data value, data user and promotion method. Finally, recent research trend of OGD utilization is summarized and future research directions are prospected based on research results.

[Result/conclusion] This paper reveals three research tendencies in OGD utilization studies. First, previous OGD utilization study was driven by the supply side, while current study tends to motivated more by the demand side. Second, previous OGD utilization study was usually conducted from a macro viewpoint, while fine-grained research angle is more preferred currently. Third, research paid more attention on data usage in government departments in former studies, while research on the use of OGD by the public is increasing. Several research topics are worth researching in the future, namely OGD utilization value, diverse OGD users and solid support measures for OGD utilization. From China’s perspective, the angle and depth in OGD utilization research need to be further enhanced. Moreover, studies that reflect Chinese characteristics are essential for the improvement of the international level of China's OGD utilization research. },

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Semaan2020,

title = {Effectuation et innovation dans des contextes contraints en ressources : une revue de littérature},

author = {Marleine Semaan},

url = {https://www.cairn.info/revue-innovations-2020-3-page-153.htm},

doi = {10.3917/inno.063.0153},

isbn = {9782807394209},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-09-09},

urldate = {2020-09-09},

journal = {Innovations},

volume = {2020/3},

number = {63},

pages = {153 à 178},

abstract = {Ce travail a pour objectif d’identifier à quel(s) type(s) d’innovations contraintes par les ressources, la théorie de l’effectuation est reliée et quelles sont les problématiques pour lesquelles ces deux littératures sont mobilisées conjointement. Pour ce faire, nous avons réalisé une revue systématique de littérature basée sur une analyse bibliométrique (co-citations des références) et une analyse sémantique (co-citations des mots clés). Les résultats de ces analyses effectuées sur 55 documents, à l’aide de la plateforme d’analyse textuelle et bibliométrique, CORTEXT Manager, montrent que la théorie de l’effectuation est fortement liée au bricolage par le biais de différentes thématiques liées à l’entrepreneuriat telles que l’éducation entrepreneuriale, l’internationalisation, les approches d’exploration et de création d’opportunités et l’entrepreneuriat social. },

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Macq2020,

title = {From Deliberation to Production: Public Participation in Science and Technology Policies of the European Commission (1998–2019)},

author = {Hadrien Macq and Elise Tancoigne and Bruno Strasser},

url = {http://hdl.handle.net/2268/246902},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09405-6},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-04-22},

urldate = {2020-04-22},

journal = {Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy},

abstract = {This article investigates how a discourse about the role and value of public participation in science, technology, and innovation emerged and evolved in the research policies of the European Commission. At the beginning of the twenty- first century, two main discourses have been successively institutionalized: the first focused on participation in policy-making, while the second aimed at participation in the production of knowledge and innovation. This paper distinguishes three main institutional phases: (i) a phase dedicated to public participation in the governance of science and technology (2000–2010); (ii) a reframing period of science and tech- nology policies by the Commission to integrate the growing emphasis on innova- tion (2010–2014); (iii) a period focusing on co-creation and citizen science as new ways to involve the public in science and technology (2014-today). Factors such as individual commitments of key policy actors, specific epistemic communities and institutional dynamics within the Commission played a crucial role in shaping the policies of participation. But broader factors are also essential to account for these changes. In this respect, the economic crisis of the late 2000s appears fundamental to understanding how the conception and promotion of public participation in the European science and technology policies have evolved over time. This paper thus offers new insights to the analysis of the political economy of public participation.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Dagiral2020,

title = {Terrains & travaux, 2000-2019, une analyse de vingt années de production},

author = {Éric Dagiral and Ashveen Peerbaye and Caroline Vincensini},

url = {https://www.cairn.info/revue-terrains-et-travaux-2020-1-page-29.htm},

doi = {10.3917/tt.036.0029},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-04-01},

urldate = {2020-04-01},

journal = {Terrains & travaux},

volume = {1-2},

number = {36-37},

pages = {29-58},

abstract = {Cet article propose une analyse à la fois quantitative et qualitative des vingt premières années de production de terrains & travaux. Dans le cadre de ce numéro anniversaire, il revient d’abord sur le projet éditorial de la revue et en précise le fonctionnement concret à travers les évolutions simultanées de son comité de rédaction, de ses rubriques, ainsi que des thématiques choisies au fil des ans. Il analyse ensuite en détail une série de caractéristiques des auteur·e·s des 359 articles publiés depuis 2000, puis esquisse la façon dont la revue se positionne dans l’espace plus large des revues de sciences sociales, ainsi que le paysage des auteur·e·s les plus cité·e·s que la revue donne à voir. Ces coups de projecteur mettent en évidence la relative professionnalisation de la revue depuis sa création comme « Cahiers du département de sciences sociales de l’ENS de Cachan ». Ils révèlent aussi la centralité de la sociologie dans la trajectoire de cette « revue de sciences sociales », centralité qui n’équivaut cependant pas à une exclusivité, la revue laissant une place non négligeable depuis sa création à d’autres sciences sociales à travers le comité de rédaction, les auteur·e·s publié·e·s et les références citées.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Noël2019,

title = {'Made in Europe for the World': Making a Claim for a European Chemistry in Publication Programs. The Case of the Supramolecular Chemistry (1987-2005)},

author = {Marianne Noël},

url = {http://www.annalsfondazioneluigieinaudi.it/en/browse/current-issue/6-volume-liii-1/87-made-in-europe-for-the-world-making-a-claim-for-a-european-chemistry-in-publication-programs.-the-case-of-the-supramolecular-chemistry-1987-2005

https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4546060#page=149},

doi = {10.26331/1075},

issn = {2532-4969},

year  = {2019},

date = {2019-06-01},

urldate = {2019-06-01},

journal = {Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi},

volume = {Volume LIII 1 - 2019},

pages = {141-180},

abstract = {The University of Strasbourg is the birthplace of a research specialty (supramolecular chemistry or SMC) which has grown considerably in the last 40 years and has had a significant scientific impact. The emergence of SMC was orchestrated to a large extent by Nobel laureate Jean-Marie Lehn, but a network of scientists, as well as the University and the Alsace Region, were also key players in this regard. Lehn was instrumental in the creation of a series of European chemistry journals in the late 1990s, whose genealogy I trace. My purpose is to examine the conditions of the success of a case of European integration that is not a major technological program but simply a “publication infrastructure”. Based on an historical analysis completed with a fieldwork study, I argue that the circulation and appropriation of concepts and languages of the SMC were central in the development of a European “publication program”. I show that this program created a sense of Europeanness that was also shaped in relation to the extra-European world, both in opposition (standing against the USA) and yet open to the world, as illustrated in the motto “Made in Europe for the world”.},

note = {Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi : an Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{raimbault2016mapping,

title = {Mapping the emergence of synthetic biology},

author = {Benjamin Raimbault and Jean-Philippe Cointet and Pierre-Benoît Joly},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161522},

doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0161522},

year  = {2016},

date = {2016-01-01},

urldate = {2016-01-01},

journal = {PloS one},

volume = {11},

number = {9},

pages = {e0161522},

publisher = {Public Library of Science},

abstract = {In this paper, we apply an original scientometric analyses to a corpus comprising synthetic biology (SynBio) publications in Thomson Reuters Web of Science to characterize the emergence of this new scientific field. Three results were drawn from this empirical investigation. First, despite the exponential growth of publications, the study of population level statistics (newcomers proportion, collaboration network structure) shows that SynBio has entered a stabilization process since 2010. Second, the mapping of textual and citational networks shows that SynBio is characterized by high heterogeneity and four different approaches: the central approach, where biobrick engineering is the most widespread; genome engineering; protocell creation; and metabolic engineering. We suggest that synthetic biology acts as an umbrella term allowing for the mobilization of resources, and also serves to relate scientific content and promises of applications. Third, we observed a strong intertwinement between epistemic and socio-economic dynamics. Measuring scientific production and impact and using structural analysis data, we identified a core set of mostly American scientists. Biographical analysis shows that these central and influential scientists act as “boundary spanners,” meaning that their importance to the field lies not only in their academic contributions, but also in their capacity to interact with other social spaces that are outside the academic sphere.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{raimbault2013caracterisation,

title = {Caractérisation du processus d’émergence de la biologie synthétique à partir d’une approche scientomiétrique},

author = {Benjamin Raimbault and Jean-Philippe Cointet and Pierre-Benoît Joly},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/201329s213},

doi = {10.1051/medsci/201329s213},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-01-01},

urldate = {2013-01-01},

journal = {médecine/sciences},

volume = {29},

pages = {47-55},

publisher = {Éditions EDK, Groupe EDP Sciences},

abstract = {La biologie de synthèse est un espace hétérogène dont la définition n’est pas stabilisée. Elle se situe à l’intersection de différents champs disciplinaires : chimie, biologie moléculaire, bio-informatique, et est classiquement abordée par la littérature selon trois angles [1–3] : 1 une approche « DNA based device construction » (biobrick), ou approche bottom-up, focalisée sur l’ingénierie de circuits de gènes synthétiques ; 2 une approche « genome-driven cell engineering », ou approche top-down, focalisée sur la synthèse d’un génome dans son intégralité ; 3 une approche « proto-cell creation » qui vise à recréer des systèmes cellulaires minimaux, et en vertu de laquelle les recherches sont focalisées sur le principe de l’émergence, ouvertement présenté comme un obstacle par les tenants de la première approche.

},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}