CorText Manager around the world

@article{Barats2024,

title = {Dire l’inceste sur Twitter : caractéristiques discursives et dynamiques de circulation de #MeTooInceste},

author = {Christine Barats and Laetitia Biscarrat and Camille Chanial},

url = {https://journals.openedition.org/questionsdecommunication/34785},

doi = {/10.4000/11wx1},

issn = {2259-8901},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-06-30},

journal = {Questions de communication},

volume = {45},

abstract = {Dans le prolongement de #MeToo, en janvier 2021, le hashtag #MeTooInceste a contribué à réactualiser le problème public de l’inceste en France. Afin de prêter attention aux caractéristiques de ces prises de parole, différents matériaux ont été recueillis (corpus de tweets et entretiens). Les différents types de données ont permis de combiner et d’articuler des analyses quantitatives et qualitatives et de les contextualiser, dans une dynamique de méthodes mixtes. Les caractéristiques sémio-discursives de ces prises de parole ont été mises au jour, en particulier leurs caractéristiques lexicales et morphosyntaxiques. La diversité des prises de parole montre ainsi la centralité du témoignage et éclaire les ressorts de sa circulation, en l’occurrence le rôle de certains comptes qui contribuent à la dynamique de circulation du hashtag et à son déploiement.



In the wake of #MeToo, the January 2021 hashtag #MeTooInceste helped to update the public issue of incest in France. We collected various types of material (a corpus of tweets and interviews) in order to examine the characteristics of these expressions. We have contextualized, analyzed and discussed these data thanks to a mixed method relying on both quantitative and qualitative tools. We have uncovered the semiodiscursive characteristics of these utterances, in particular their lexical and morphosyntactic features. The diversity of the responses shows the centrality of the testimony and sheds light on the reasons for its circulation, in this case the role of certain Twitter accounts that contribute to the circulation of the hashtag and its deployment.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Orduña-Malea2023,

title = {Research assessment under debate: disentangling the interest around the DORA declaration on Twitter},

author = {Enrique Orduña-Malea and Núria Bautista-Puig},

url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-023-04872-6#article-info

},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04872-6},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-11-17},

journal = {Scientometrics},

abstract = {Much debate has been around the misapplication of metrics in research assessment. As a result of this concern, the Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA) was launched, an initiative that caused opposing viewpoints. However, the discussion topics about DORA have not been formally identified, especially in participatory environments outside the scholarly communication process, such as social networks. This paper contributes to that end by analyzing 20,717 DORA-related tweets published from 2015 to 2022. The results show an increasing volume of tweets, mainly promotional and informative, but with limited participation of users, either commenting or engaging with the tweets, generating a scarcely polarized conversation driven primarily by a few DORA promoters. While a varied list of discussion topics is found (especially "Open science and research assessment," "Academics career assessment & innovation," and "Journal Impact Factor"), the DORA debate appears as part of broader conversations (research evaluation, open science). Further studies are needed to check whether these results are restricted to Twitter or reveal more general patterns. The findings might interest the different evaluators and evaluated agents regarding their interests and concerns around the reforms in the research evaluation.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Monaci2023,

title = {Smart working during the Covid19 pandemic in Italy: Twitter narratives in female-centered communities},

author = {Sara Monaci and Tatiana Mazali and Simone Persico},

url = {https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa03/mediascapes/article/view/18290

https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa03/mediascapes/article/view/18290/17516},

issn = {2282-2542},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-07-18},

urldate = {2023-07-18},

journal = {Mediascapes Journal},

volume = {21},

issue = {1},

pages = {323–343},

abstract = {While the recent pandemic has accelerated the spread of smart working dynamics in Italy, social media increased their importance as platforms to vehiculate information and points of view and shape public opinion. In the face of extended confinement and a looming health crisis, society has had to fundamentally rethink its daily work practices, social relations, family relationship management, and work-life balance. As a result, the radical and abrupt migration to networked platforms has been a disruptive and unprecedented phenomenon. We aimed to investigate the Twitter debate on smart working during the pandemic by focusing mainly on social concerns and thematics related to work-life balance by addressing the following research questions:

- RQ1: How was the topic of smart working debated on Twitter during the Covid19 pandemic (2020-2021) in Italy, and which narratives and issues fuelled the debate the most?

- RQ2: How the public debate has received the Italian government's work-life balance measures?

- RQ3: Which topics were most discussed by women on smart working?

We used Digital Methods to cope with re-proposing data to depict collective phenomena, social transformations, and cultural expressions by analyzing natively digital data on social media platforms. We gathered more than 750.000 tweets between 28 February 2020 and 30 November 2021, and we mapped narratives and communities by using social network analysis. This allowed for the selection of the more intriguing ones to define various sub-datasets on which to conduct a topic modeling study, which aided in understanding more nuanced aspects of the highly fragmented topic. By studying the italian debate, we identified specific communities which debated government measures to help families during the pandemic and discussed digitalization and smart working as a new paradigm for work. We found DAD (Didactic at Distance, aka homeschooling) as a transversal topic that highly affected how people experienced smart working.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Skovgaard2023,

title = {Who tweets what about personalised medicine? Promises and concerns from Twitter discussions in Denmark},

author = {Lea Skovgaard and Anders Grundtvig},

url = {https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/20552076231169832},

doi = {10.1177/20552076231169832},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-03-29},

urldate = {2023-03-29},

journal = {Digital Health},

volume = {9},

pages = {1-12},

abstract = {Digital health data are seen as valuable resources for the development of better and more efficient treatments, for instance through personalised medicine. However, health data are information about individuals who hold opinions and can challenge how data about them are used. Therefore it is important to understand public discussions around reuse of digital health data. Social media have been heralded as enabling new forms of public engagement and as a place to study social issues. In this paper, we study a public debate on Twitter about personalised medicine. We explore who participates in discussions about personalised medicine on Twitter and what they tweet about. Based on user-generated biographies we categorise users as having a ‘Professional interest in personalised medicine’ or as ‘Private’ users. We describe how users within the field tweet about the promises of personalised medicine, while users unaffiliated with the field tweet about the concrete realisation of these ambitions in the form of a new infrastructure and express concerns about the conditions for the implementation. Our study serves to remind people interested in public opinion that Twitter is a platform used for multiple purposes by different actors and not simply a bottom-up democratic forum. This study contributes with insights relevant to policymakers wishing to expand infrastructures for reuse of health data. First, by providing insights into what is discussed about health data reuse. Second, by exploring how Twitter can be used as a platform to study public discussions about reuse

of health data.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}