CorText Manager around the world

@article{Bautista-Puig2024b,

title = {How do Citizens Engage with Science. Challenges and Recommendations},

author = {Núria Bautista-Puig and Enrique Orduña-Malea},

url = {https://revista.profesionaldelainformacion.com/index.php/EPI/article/view/87884},

doi = {/10.3145/epi.2024.0601},

issn = {1699-2407},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-09-03},

urldate = {2025-01-03},

journal = {Profesional De La información},

volume = {33},

issue = {6},

abstract = {Citizen science (CS) has become a crucial form of public participation in science, helping to address global challenges and contribute to more democratic knowledge production. Despite its increasing presence (including literature reviews), uncertainties persist regarding the quality of data collected, the level of citizen participation, and ethical concerns. This editorial explores CS participation, aiming to provide a comprehensive analysis of engagement patterns, and challenges, and offering recommendations to enhance citizen involvement in scientific initiatives. A systematic review of existing literature indexed on Web of Science is conducted, following the PRISMA framework. The review covered 1,613 selected studies examining ‘participation’ across various scientific fields, identifying the methodologies used and the factors influencing engagement, such as benefits, challenges, and ethical concerns. The results reveal a growing trend in CS, particularly in the natural sciences, with citizen involvement mostly limited to data collection rather than higher-level engagement like analysis or decision-making. The study also highlights the underrepresentation of social sciences and the need for more interdisciplinary approaches. In conclusion, the article calls for increased interdisciplinarity, greater integration of citizens in decision-making processes, diversification of participatory methods, and context-specific strategies for participation. It emphasizes the importance of fostering public trust and awareness in science and proposes that these actions will improve the inclusivity and impact of citizen science initiatives.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mason2023d,

title = {Sustainable soil and land management: a systems-oriented overview of scientific literature},

author = {Eloïse Mason and Antonio Bispo and Mireille Matt and Katharina Helming and Elena Rodriguez and Rocio Lansac and Violeta Carrasco and Mohammad Rafiul Hashar and Loes Verdonk and Gundula Prokop and David Wall and Nancy Francis and Peter Laszlo and Michael T. Löbmann},

url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsoil.2023.1268037/full

},

doi = {10.3389/fsoil.2023.1268037},

year  = {2023},

date = {2023-12-18},

journal = {Frontiers in Soil Science},

abstract = {Healthy soil is vital for our wellbeing and wealth. However, increasing demand for food and biomass may lead to unsustainable soil and land management practices that threaten soils. Other degradation processes such as soil sealing also endanger soil resources. Identifying and accessing the best available knowledge is crucial to address related sustainability issues and promote the needed transition towards sustainable soil and land management practices. Such knowledge has to cover all knowledge domains, system knowledge, target knowledge, and transformation knowledge. However, a comprehensive overview of existing research addressing societal needs related to soil is still missing, which hinders the identification of knowledge gaps. This study provides a detailed analysis of scientific literature to identify ongoing research activities and trends. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of scientific literature related to sustainable soil and land management was conducted. A systems-oriented analytical framework was used that combines soil and land related societal challenges with related knowledge domains. Our analysis revealed a significant increase in scientific publications and related interest in soil and land use-related research, above the average increase of publications within all scientific fields. Different forms of reduction and remediation of soil degradation processes (e.g. erosion, contamination) have been studied most extensively. Other topic areas like land take mitigation, soil biodiversity increase, increase of ecosystem services provision and climate change mitigation and adaption seem to be rather recent concerns, less investigated. We could highlight the importance of context-specific research, as different regions require different practices. For instance, boreal, tropical, karst and peatland regions were less studied. Furthermore, we found that diversifying soil management practices such as agroforestry or including livestock into arable systems are valuable options for increasing biomass, mitigating/adapting to climate change, and improving soil related ecosystem services. A recent trend towards the latter research topic indicates the transition from a soil conservation-oriented perspective to a soil service-oriented perspective, which may be better suited to integrate the social and economic dimensions of soil health improvement alongside the ecological dimension.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Lascialfari2022,

title = {Unpacking research lock-in through a diachronic analysis of topic cluster trajectories in scholarly publications},

author = {Matteo Lascialfari and Marie-Benoît Magrini and Guillaume Cabanac},

url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-022-04514-3

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-022-04514-3.pdf?pdf=button%20sticky},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04514-3},

year  = {2022},

date = {2022-11-01},

urldate = {2022-11-01},

journal = {Scientometrics},

volume = {127},

abstract = {Lock-in and path-dependency are well-known concepts in economics dealing with unbalanced development of alternative options. Lock-in was studied in various sectors, considering production or consumption sides. Lock-in in academic research went little addressed. Yet, science develops through knowledge accumulation and cross-fertilisation of research topics, that could lead to similar phenomena when some topics do not sufficiently benefit from accumulation mechanisms, reducing innovation opportunities from the concerned field consequently. We introduce an original method to explore these phenomena by comparing topic trajectories in research fields according to strong or weak accumulative processes over time. We combine the concepts of ‘niche’ and ‘mainstream’ from transition studies with scientometric tools to revisit Callon’s strategic diagram with a diachronic perspective of topic clusters over time. Considering the trajectories of semantic clusters, derived from titles and authors’ keywords extracted from scholarly publications in the Web of Science, we applied our method to two competing research fields in food sciences and technology related to pulses and soya over the last 60 years worldwide. These highly interesting species for the sustainability of agrifood systems experienced unbalanced development and thus is under-debated. Our analysis confirms that food research for soya was more dynamic than for pulses: soya topic clusters revealed a stronger accumulative research path by cumulating mainstream positions while pulses research did not meet the same success. This attempt to unpack research lock-in for evaluating the competition dynamics of scientific fields over time calls for future works, by strengthening the method and testing it on other research fields.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Gaulda2020,

title = {Analyse en réseau par fouille de données textuelles systématique du concept de psychiatrie personnalisée et de précision},

author = {Christophe Gauld and Jean-Arthur M. Franchi},

url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013700620302360},

doi = { https://doi.org/10.1016/j.encep.2020.08.008},

issn = {0013-7006},

year  = {2020},

date = {2020-11-12},

urldate = {2020-11-12},

journal = {L'Encéphale},

abstract = {Objectifs. – La médecine personnalisée et de précision nécessite une clarification des concepts qui y sont rattachés. À notre connaissance, il n’existe pas d’exploration systématique de la littérature portant sur les dimensions et les concepts de la psychiatrie personnalisée et de précision et sur leurs usages dans les domaines neuroscientifiques et génétiques. Cet article propose donc d’explorer les dimensions et les concepts de la psychiatrie personnalisée et de précision.

Méthodes. – Une analyse en réseau par fouille de données textuelles systématique issue d’une revue exhaustive de la littérature internationale autour des termes de “precision psychiatry” et de “personalized psychiatry” a été réalisée. Cette fouille de données textuelles a été représentée sous forme d’un réseau permettant d’analyser les dimensions et les concepts de la psychiatrie personnalisée et de précision. Résultats. – La psychiatrie personnalisée et de précision renvoie à six dimensions retrouvées au sein de l’analyse du réseau textuel. Ces six dimensions correspondent aux domaines scientifiques qui étu- dient la psychiatrie personnalisée et de précision, à savoir : la génétique, la pharmacogénétique, les approches computationnelles, le raffinement des essais thérapeutiques, les biomarqueurs et la stadifica- tion. L’analyse des termes renvoie à un ensemble de concepts hétérogènes.

Conclusions. – L’hétérogénéité retrouvée dans la littérature sur la psychiatrie personnalisée et de précision peut témoigner d’un manque d’un cadre théorique pluraliste et intégratif. Ce cadre de travail pourrait être basé sur un formalisme naturalisant mais non réducteur, conscient des enjeux sociétaux des sciences et de leur implémentation dans les dispositifs de recherche et cliniques de la psychiatrie.

Objectives

The current challenges of psychiatric nosology and semiology are part of an interdisciplinary and integrative framework. The paradigm of the personalized and precision psychiatry proposes to study this discipline according to new approaches and methodologies. Personalized and precision psychiatry therefore requires clarification of its concepts. To our knowledge, there is no systematic exploration of the literature on the application of the concepts of personalized and precision medicine in the field of psychiatry. This article proposes thus to explore the framework of personalized and precision medicine applied to psychiatry.

Methods

We explored the framework of personalized and precision medicine applied to psychiatry by a textual network analysis. Firstly, we performed a systematic text-mining (Natural Language Processing) from an exhaustive review of the international literature with the terms “precision psychiatry” and “personalized psychiatry”. Secondly, this analysis of textual data allowed us to build a textual network which made it possible to visualize the most proximal terms (the most frequently associated in the literature). Finally, we extracted from the network the main dimensions explored in the scientific literature, and we studied the relative importance of each term by analyzing the network centrality. In addition, a brief bibliometric analysis was conducted.

Results

We show that personalized and precision psychiatry refers to six dimensions found in the textual network analysis which correspond to the scientific fields which study personalized and precision psychiatry: genetics, pharmacogenetics, artificial intelligence, therapeutic trials, biomarkers and staging. We explore how each dimension relates to the mechanization of psychiatric disorders. However, precision and personalized psychiatry, which tries to refine the levels of mechanistic explanations for psychiatry, suffers from a conceptual heterogeneity. Indeed, textual analysis also allows us to find terms referring to a set of heterogeneous concepts. Many methodological fields and epistemological concepts are invoked in this literature, without standardization.

Conclusions

The paradox of personalized and precision psychiatry is to associate a strong conceptual heterogeneity with a well-defined mechanistic component. Heterogeneity found in literature on personalized and precision psychiatry testifies to the lack of a pluralist and integrative theoretical framework. This framework could be based on a naturalizing but non-reducing formalism, aware of the societal challenges of the sciences and their implementation in the research and clinical systems of psychiatry.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{chavalarias2013phylomemetic,

title = {Phylomemetic patterns in science evolution - the rise and fall of scientific fields},

author = {David Chavalarias and Jean-Philippe Cointet},

url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054847},

doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0054847},

year  = {2013},

date = {2013-01-01},

urldate = {2013-01-01},

journal = {PloS one},

volume = {8},

number = {2},

pages = {e54847},

publisher = {Public Library of Science},

abstract = {We introduce an automated method for the bottom-up reconstruction of the cognitive evolution of science, based on big-data issued from digital libraries, and modeled as lineage relationships between scientific fields. We refer to these dynamic structures as phylomemetic networks or phylomemies, by analogy with biological evolution; and we show that they exhibit strong regularities, with clearly identifiable phylomemetic patterns. Some structural properties of the scientific fields - in particular their density -, which are defined independently of the phylomemy reconstruction, are clearly correlated with their status and their fate in the phylomemy (like their age or their short term survival). Within the framework of a quantitative epistemology, this approach raises the question of predictibility for science evolution, and sketches a prototypical life cycle of the scientific fields: an increase of their cohesion after their emergence, the renewal of their conceptual background through branching or merging events, before decaying when their density is getting too low.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}